I was watching some YouTube, trying to find some forgotten gems from retro systems. I ran into one about the Jaguar and decided to watch it.

Well, the fellow said a lot of the games were great, and I was kind of curious about that because I don’t think it’s controversial to say there’s only a handful of decent games on the Jag, but this fellow was rating everything highly.

Later on I sat down to think about it and I realized something… after every game the fellow would say “Oh, and you can get it for about $XX.XX.”

At that point the light-bulb went off and I realized this fellow is probably deriving enjoyment from collecting the Jaguar games, not playing them. To him, if he buys a game, plays it for a few minutes to make sure it works, it’s probably a winner for him.

For me, who is getting Jaguar games from uhhhh a friend, I don’t care about collecting them, I just want some fun stuff to play.

Anyway, I learned my lesson: I’ll believe non-collectors’ opinions more than collectors because they are mostly concerned with gameplay instead of how it looks on the shelf, or how rare and difficult it was to acquire.

P.S. I don’t know how “hot” of a take this is, but I figure it’ll probably hurt the feelings of collectors, so that’s why I prefixed it.

  • any1th3r3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I guess, by some standards, I could be qualified as a collector - I buy games for OG hardware before playing them.
    However, and I don’t believe I’m the only “collector” doing this, if a game is bad, didn’t age well, etc, I will definitely say so and likely would sell said game if I’ve no interest in playing it again.

    Sure, there are collectors who don’t play games at all and review based on price, if that, but I know there are also people who do it like I do.