• veee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    And just how much of it will be used in executive compensation?

    EDIT: While I am in support of more funding for local news coverage my comment is in reference to the $3.3 million in bonuses paid to 45 executives after having laid off 141 employees back in August.

    • DarkWinterNights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      In the context of executive wages, it’s important to contrast this to what the industry standard is. We’re not reinventing capitalism overnight (nor is it the argument being litigated), and fair market incentives must be competitive to retain talent. It’s not a matter of whether someone agrees fair market is right or not - it’s the reality of how society currently functions (and I point out because this is almost always the fundamental principle to most of these arguments).

      An aggregate $73k bonus is generally very small in executive talent pool - the article also goes on to point out the rest of the employee base also got $15k. Neither of these are particularly glaring.

      Instead consider Catherine Tait (CBC) - her base salary is ~$500k, with a target bonus of 7-28% (~$30k-$155k) and no additional incentives. That makes her max total compensations about $700k at best (and generally more like $600k). This is super low for a typical pay band at the CEO level.

      Contrast this to Andrew MacLeod (PostMedia) - his base salary is $1.1M, with his incentives (bonus, rsu/PSU, stock, etc.) in the same 2024 year $785k, making his total compensation $1.89M, or triple Taits.

      Looking around at a number of these, the CBC is pretty consistently on the low end of these ranges, especially when considering the size of the organization.

      I’m essentially pointing out your comment argued the opposite of your stance.

      • veee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You’ve given me a lot to read up. I appreciate the write-up.

    • cecilkorik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s also expanding their mandate to cover more local news, so that’s going to have a lot of costs that won’t be going to executives.

      • veee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m certainly looking forward to better local coverage.

      • floofloof
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Publicly funded local news is really important. The right wing propaganda often flies under the radar when it comes to local news outlets that are part of some large billionaire-owned corporation.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some amount. And the rest would be used to pay salaries for existing and new staff who produce Canadian news and entertainment.