That’s because The Houthi are attacking cargo ships. They are murdering innocent people on boats who are merely traveling through one of the most important waterways for world trade.
If you are actually informed on the Yemeni civil war and global geopolitics you aren’t backing The Houthi.
Odd that your knowledge extends that far but doesn’t talk about civilian deaths, starting another war in the Middle East, or Saudi Arabia’s involvement in Yemen
It does talk about civilian deaths as I mention the sailors the Houthis are murdering. The Houthi started the civil war in Yemen. The Saudis were drawn into the war due to treaties they had signed with the ruling coalition the Houthis overthrew. This was further exacerbated by the Houthis attacking civilian sites in Saudi Arabia.
The Houthi slogan is overtly racist BTW. They aren’t the good guys by any standard.
And I love the “in this case” because you know damn well there’s tons of collateral damage caused by US forces. Or as I think I’m going to start calling them, terrorists.
You made up a story where only one person was a target and everyone else was innocent. That is not a reflection of reality and your own source proves that.
Why are you backing the instigator of the civil war if you are concerned with innocent lives?
My point is that if you kill innocents as acceptable collateral damage, it doesn’t make you morally superior. It’s pretty much the same as them, just the other side.
I’m not “backing the instigator of the civil war” I’m saying you can’t support either group of terrorists.
people feel there is more of a chance to hold people accountable for the group chat than the bombing
That’s because The Houthi are attacking cargo ships. They are murdering innocent people on boats who are merely traveling through one of the most important waterways for world trade.
If you are actually informed on the Yemeni civil war and global geopolitics you aren’t backing The Houthi.
Odd that your knowledge extends that far but doesn’t talk about civilian deaths, starting another war in the Middle East, or Saudi Arabia’s involvement in Yemen
It does talk about civilian deaths as I mention the sailors the Houthis are murdering. The Houthi started the civil war in Yemen. The Saudis were drawn into the war due to treaties they had signed with the ruling coalition the Houthis overthrew. This was further exacerbated by the Houthis attacking civilian sites in Saudi Arabia.
The Houthi slogan is overtly racist BTW. They aren’t the good guys by any standard.
If you kill 50 innocent people to take one bad guy out, aren’t you just as bad as they are?
Why are you making up stories that do not reflect the reality of this situation? The US did not kill 50 innocents to kill one person in this case
Oh really? So all of the sources talking about woman and children dying, they weren’t innocent?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_2025_United_States_attacks_in_Yemen
And I love the “in this case” because you know damn well there’s tons of collateral damage caused by US forces. Or as I think I’m going to start calling them, terrorists.
You made up a story where only one person was a target and everyone else was innocent. That is not a reflection of reality and your own source proves that.
Why are you backing the instigator of the civil war if you are concerned with innocent lives?
Removed by mod
My point is that if you kill innocents as acceptable collateral damage, it doesn’t make you morally superior. It’s pretty much the same as them, just the other side.
I’m not “backing the instigator of the civil war” I’m saying you can’t support either group of terrorists.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod