For anyone out of the loop certain people have latched onto this thing about Carney’s possible PAST assets that isn’t a standard for anyone else. What I’d like to bring up one of the people pushing this stuff out is CBC.
This is the same thing we’ve seen Americans news outlets do where as Trump style politics has completely overtaken the right wing politics and the Traditional Media has been trying make things look fair and balanced by artificially making the insane look sane while the anyone else is held to a increasingly high standard.
Current day mainstream media is already heavily right wing dominated.
Going back to CBC I don’t understand what they’re doing because the right wing thinks they’re propaganda while the left has to watch them put out straight up hit pieces while begging to be saved.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-assets-questions-1.7486242
Carney announced last week that he has put his financial assets into a blind trust to shield himself from any conflicts of interest.
…
A blind trust means Carney’s financial assets are handled by a trustee who has the legal authority to manage them but who is barred from seeking his input. Carney wouldn’t know what is in his blind trust portfolio, but would know what those assets were before they were divested.
Under the current government ethics rules meant to guard against conflicts of interest, Carney had 60 days to disclose his assets to the ethics commissioner upon being sworn in and another 60 days before that information goes public.
Asked Monday if he should disclose what financial holdings he had before they were put into the blind trust, Carney said he has exceeded the expectations of the current rules and is being held to a different standard.
…
“Your line of questioning is trying to invent new rules. I’m complying with the rules that Parliament has laid out and… I will continue to comply with those rules,” he said.
Also whatever this is :
Prime Minister Mark Carney pushed back on reporter questions about his financial holdings during a news conference on Monday.
The unnamed reported in question is Rosemary Barton - Chief Political Correspondent for CBC the same news network he works for.
Editorial leads won’t mean a thing when news of Danielle’s self-disclosure in the Breitbart interview breaks tomorrow.
I wonder if it will “break” outside of the outrage in places like this because that thing is for more than 2 weeks ago and was entirely public. I can understand why I wouldn’t listen to that crap but you’d think a number of people in the news world saw it and just went meh.