The limits of U.S. President Donald Trump’s brand of extremely personalized, belligerent diplomacy have never been more apparent than with the negligible outcomes this week involving two of the world’s deadliest ongoing conflicts.
In Gaza, Israel’s military shattered the tenuous ceasefire on Tuesday by inflicting the largest number of deaths in a single day on Palestinians since the war started in October 2023.
And after Trump’s phone call with Vladimir Putin on Ukraine, any hope that the Russian president was prepared to roll back or significantly restrain his ongoing three-year assault on the country also proved largely illusory.
Both results were easily predictable, say veteran diplomats, given Trump’s almost single-minded focus on scoring quick wins at the expense of the harder work of dogged diplomacy resulting in lasting gains.
Allow me to help you learn to read the news, thread. “Madman” is in quotes in the headline for a reason. If you actually RTFA, you find that the word isn’t being used in the headline to refer to Trump’s mental faculties, it is a reference to a so-called “madman theory” of diplomacy. The article is not taking a position on whether or not Trump is sane, and when you take up that argument with the article, and scoff at it for apparently arguing that Trump is sane when it has nothing to say on that subject, you look kind of foolish.
Thank you.
I need to rethink how I scroll past endless headlines (and even summaries), and form an impression of them. I should be looking for interesting articles to read, not just matching headlines with my preconceived notions.
Edit: it’s even worse when 90% of the conversation is about the headline, rather than the article.