/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agoThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.comexternal-linkmessage-square138linkfedilinkarrow-up1496arrow-down118file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1478arrow-down1external-linkThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.com/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square138linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaren2burnslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoYour response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoAs I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.
Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.