Da Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Mobile Wallpaper@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 14 hours agoIntergalactic bedroomlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down18
arrow-up172arrow-down1imageIntergalactic bedroomlemmy.dbzer0.comDa Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Mobile Wallpaper@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareZerolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoDang. How could you tell? I’ve found it relatively easy to distinguish when it’s “realistic” art but I don’t know any techniques for identifying generated “drawings”.
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoThe details on the walls are all blobby up close, and lettering on the bed sheets is junk too.
minus-squareHideakikarate@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoFor me, it’s the NASA logo. Looks like shit.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoCheck the detail on some pieces. The text on the blanket, the “lights” on the panel behind the bed. The light fuzziness around circles and straight lines wherever a lot of detail tends to go is usually a good indicator. Most image models will put little details at weird angles or without any clear pattern that a human would’ve probably overthought and made straight.
Dang. How could you tell? I’ve found it relatively easy to distinguish when it’s “realistic” art but I don’t know any techniques for identifying generated “drawings”.
The details on the walls are all blobby up close, and lettering on the bed sheets is junk too.
For me, it’s the NASA logo. Looks like shit.
Check the detail on some pieces. The text on the blanket, the “lights” on the panel behind the bed.
The light fuzziness around circles and straight lines wherever a lot of detail tends to go is usually a good indicator.
Most image models will put little details at weird angles or without any clear pattern that a human would’ve probably overthought and made straight.