What are the chances that these Athletic articles are agent plants? I haven’t taken/read the Athletic for years. Their articles, at first, seemed interesting and novel. Then it just seemed that every article was a planted puff piece.
I just don’t understand how an NBA player’s stat line in a shitty amateur contest can possible be a news story to anyone.
I do get people who can attend being excited to see a guy in person if a real game is prohibitive, but he could put up 200 points and it wouldn’t be even kind of an accomplishment.
What are the chances that these Athletic articles are agent plants? I haven’t taken/read the Athletic for years. Their articles, at first, seemed interesting and novel. Then it just seemed that every article was a planted puff piece.
I just don’t understand how an NBA player’s stat line in a shitty amateur contest can possible be a news story to anyone.
I do get people who can attend being excited to see a guy in person if a real game is prohibitive, but he could put up 200 points and it wouldn’t be even kind of an accomplishment.
[The Athletic] SHOCKING! Kyrie Irving is better at basketball than players who are worse than him.