Tea@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-27 hours agoU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services proposes to review social media of people applying for US citizenship, green cards, and asylum or refugee status, to comply with Trump's Executive order.www.federalregister.govexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services proposes to review social media of people applying for US citizenship, green cards, and asylum or refugee status, to comply with Trump's Executive order.www.federalregister.govTea@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-27 hours agomessage-square9fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBzdalderonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 hours agoThis actually makes sense. The problem though, will be the same reason fact checkers failed; personal and institutional bias on what’s considered acceptable. Only an unbiased AI could do this well, and that’s a loose statement.
minus-squaredermanuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 hours agoI don’t think there’s such a thing as an unbiased AI. They’re all biased based on the input data. Something like this would be inherently subjective, it’s not a pure data question with a clear yes or no.
minus-squareBzdalderonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·32 minutes agoI feel like you missed my “loose statement” point
minus-squareCptBread@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 hour agoMachine learning and LLMs isn’t the only way to do AI though. (though your second point I do kinda agree with)
This actually makes sense. The problem though, will be the same reason fact checkers failed; personal and institutional bias on what’s considered acceptable.
Only an unbiased AI could do this well, and that’s a loose statement.
I don’t think there’s such a thing as an unbiased AI. They’re all biased based on the input data.
Something like this would be inherently subjective, it’s not a pure data question with a clear yes or no.
I feel like you missed my “loose statement” point
Machine learning and LLMs isn’t the only way to do AI though. (though your second point I do kinda agree with)