During his recent campaign for president, Donald Trump repeatedly stated that he had a secret plan for settling the war in Ukraine. He suggested that he would be able to resolve the conflict within a day of so of taking office. That obviously was political hyperbole because the war is still going on. Trump and people in his administration are now talking to Russian president Vladimir Putin and Russian officials in an effort to find a way to end the war and possibly even normalize relations between the United States and Russia. There is one great big obstacle, however, to … Continue reading →
  • humanspiralOPMEnglish
    14·
    2 months ago

    I find it disingenuous that you justify those actions as ok, just because USA did the same abhorrent things.

    Not clear on what you mean. If you are suggesting that all foreign influence is evil, US influence is seperate for being demonic puppetry of targets in order to diminish Russia and China, or permit corrupt privatization and US military base funding. That Russia offers trade or narratives that discouraged Ukraine and Georgia from being a suicidal US puppet has no evil to it.

    With the invasions, the list of applicants increased, and all the countries are happy using more of the GDP for warfare.

    That “happiness” is worrisome and irrational. Democracy is supporting “good pro nato nazis” while appoplectic over “bad anti nato nazis”. The derangement of democracy, and pro war left/center is somehow a reactionary “win over the rational” like conservatives hurt themselves by supporting “wins over liberals”.

    Stoltenberg was very proud of the achievement you listed, including how it was used to provoke war on Russia, and ignore their requested path for security guarantees.

    you seem to promote war constantly. You have been defending the USA actions lately, you might want to update the description on that too.

    I deny this, but examples?

    • NilsEnglish
      11·
      2 months ago

      disingenuous

      Lol, you want to debate, but you had to invent arguments and assign them to me. This is ridiculous and you are very dishonest.

      My text has several points, none of them you addressed and just insisted on spilling around your warmongering.

      Even when we seem to agree that gov spending should be focused on something else than warfare - I find ironic your conclusions, “Russia started a war, and it was used to provoke war on Russia”.

      I deny this, but examples?

      You know which ones, do not play coy

      I feel like you don’t really care what people write, you just use whatever to defend war, either that or your LLM/Call center script is broken.

      • humanspiralOPMEnglish
        12·
        2 months ago

        As mentioned, I did not understand your point, and went through possible interpretations.

        • NilsEnglish
          1·
          2 months ago

          Oh yes, it is very difficult to ask someone to explain something. It is easier to go from “it is wrong to justify an invasion by fear of nukes” to “all foreign influence is evil”.

          I re-read my text a few times, and I could not find anywhere saying that helping a nation build a dam, help with infrastructure or logistics projects, create economic blocs or easing bureaucracy for transit as being evil. Nice gymnastics over there to spill your warmongering propaganda.