cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/26136291

Mozilla has just deleted the following:

“Does Firefox sell your personal data?”

“Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "

Source: Lundke journal.

  • PerogiBoi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So if you don’t want to use a chromium based browser but also care about privacy, you’re now fucked?

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      If you don’t want to use Gecko nor Chromium, I am aware of the following alternatives:

      WebKit

      Though associated with Apple and Safari, WebKit (@[email protected]) has its origins in KDE and its Konqueror browser. KDE developed its own web engine called KHTML, which was forked into WebKit. It’s therefore fully open source, despite the Apple connection.

      On Linux you can use WebKit in GNOME Web (formerly Epiphany) or Konqueror. If you’re on Mac, Safari is probably your best bet. Windows users appear to be out of luck.

      Servo

      Servo (@[email protected]) is a brand new Rust-based engine which was originally developed by Mozilla, but which was abandoned by them like good things often are. Thankfully the Linux foundation took over developments. It’s still in development, but from their download page you can take it for a spin within seconds on all three major operating systems. It’s looking pretty good.

      They maintain a list of things made with Servo. The most promising project so far appears to be a browser named Verso.

      Ladybird

      Ladybird is another development to follow. Unlike WebKit and Servo, Ladybird is being developed as a web browser in its own right, but this browser will come with a completely original rendering engine. It aims to have an alpha released next year, and is largely written in C++.

    • vaguerant@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Firefox is open-source. Certainly, you’re out of options in terms of “name-brand” browsers, but there’s a number of Firefox forks. On desktop, LibreWolf is the closest thing to mainline and on Android, IronFox is the equivalent.

      If you want something more than just “Firefox minus the branding and tracking”, some of the deeper forks are Zen Browser and Floorp.

      • SplashJackson
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What happened to Fennec and PaleMoon? Are they no bueno these days?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I can’t speak to PaleMoon, but I use Fennec on my phone. My understanding is that they try to track as closely as they can to Firefox main, but with enough changes to be a separate thing.

          • vaguerant@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’ve heard nothing negative about PaleMoon either, as far as privacy. I do think it’s a bit tougher to recommend to the average user due to its single-process architecture.

            The memory footprint is great, but everybody is kind of used to the performance and stability gains from multi-process browsers. I would feel weird recommending somebody coming off Firefox jump to PaleMoon.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              I feel weird recommending any Firefox fork other than Iceweasel/Fennec (name change only, pretty much) or Tor/Mullvad Browser. Everything else runs a risk of poor maintenance, which could lead to security vulnerabilities.

    • whaleross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve seen a lot of advocating for Waterfox that I believe is a fork of FF without corporate shenanigans.

      • kat@orbi.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Don’t they have a bunch of security issues gone untouched for over a decade now?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Does Waterfox (or any of the other forks people are proposing) have apps for iPad OS and Android, and account syncing to enable bookmarks, extensions, and tabs to transfer between devices?

        • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Firefox for iOS ist based on WebKit like Safari. Mozilla stopped porting Gecko over to iOS years ago as Apple’s policy doesn’t allow anything other that WebKit browsers. Even Google Chrome on iOS uses WebKit.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I don’t actually care what backend engine is used (in fact, I have long argued that Mozilla would be better off maintaining a fork of Chromium, and concentrating their effort on keeping good security and privacy features, rather than duplicating work rendering components and implementing JavaScript methods). I care about how my data is used and about the convenience of the experience with features like syncing. If I use Firefox/Waterfox only on my computers, but Chrome on Android and Safari on iPadOS, I don’t get synced tabs and bookmarks.

            • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Independent browser engine developers have a say in how web standards evolve. their influence is limited of course, but they use it to keep web open. Google have long been trying to integrate more “advanced” advertisement and data collection technologies directly in web browsers (including imposing it on non-Chromium browser through “open” web standards).

              The moment Google has full control of technologies involved they will do everything in their power to make ad blockers technically impossible (or at least extremely complicated and inefficient) and data collection mandatory, integrated directly in Chromium. And they will do so in such a way that most websites will simply not work on Chromium forks with these “features” disabled, so everyone will be forced to comply.

        • vaguerant@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Waterfox and IronFox are both on Android. I’m not aware of any Firefox forks for iOS, but I’ve never really looked into it, either. All Firefox forks that I’m aware of are compatible with Firefox Sync. If you don’t trust Mozilla’s Firefox Sync service (and personally, I think it’s fine: being end-to-end encrypted, Mozilla can’t see what you have in Sync regardless), you can also self-host your own Firefox Sync server.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            All Firefox forks that I’m aware of are compatible with Firefox Sync. If you don’t trust Mozilla’s Firefox Sync service (and personally, I think it’s fine: being end-to-end encrypted, Mozilla can’t see what you have in Sync regardless)

            Ah thanks for this. That’s really good to know. I was a little concerned that syncing your tabs in Firefox might be precisely one of those things that they’re talking about with this new update.

            you can also self-host your own Firefox Sync server

            Oh, that’s really cool! Do they have a Docker image for that? (Or even better, a Synology package?)

        • whaleross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t know but I doubt it, considering they are privacy oriented and it would be counterproductive to have your data shared to some other third party.

      • PerogiBoi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Right but it’s not even something one can use or download right now or in the short term so it’s kind of not even worth considering at the moment.