• Albbi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Golf requires over 1600 square meters per player. It is a horribly inefficient use of space. They could be turned into great parks where lots of people could go, but instead only a restricted few are allowed in that area at a time.

    At the very least, kick golf courses out of cities. They can be on the outskirts.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They usually are on the outskirts. The land value alone is too high in the city.

      Also, not everything has to be about max efficiency. People enjoy golfing, so there should be somewhere for them to golf.

      • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure, just ban private and exclusionary clubs and give everyone the right to join and play of they wish. Then its fair.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe it’s a location thing, but most courses around me are open to the public. Of the private ones I know of, one is exclusively for the owners of the McMansions on the course itself, and realistically, that would just be a choice between golf course or more McMansions. In that particular case, the golf course is probably the better choice for the environment.