I did not realize they were trying to compete in the first place.

  • ILikeBoobies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    How did you get “make steam worse” from that?

    Everything else still exists, just not controlled by Valve

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        How? If any feature is necessary then it will be filled by someone else

        You aren’t losing anything

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Apart from all the non-profitable features divorced from meaning.

          The forums would go in the blink of an eye.

          And then each section would try to make itself complete in itself to hoard user time, and at least one would start selling advertising space.

            • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Negatively.

              In money for servers as well as time. And that’s for something with far less users than Steam.

              • ILikeBoobies
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                That’s the point

                It’s done because you want to do it not to make money

                Maybe you have 10-20 forums installed into your client to cover the games you play

                • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  So when you said “break up Steam” you didn’t mean it in the usual, anti-monopoly sense where bits of a company are spun out into independent entities or sold off?

                  You meant let everything be done by enthusiasts and have it kinda interoperable?

                  I’m not against that, but I think there are bigger dragons of capitalism to slay first before we hope that splitting forums off of Steam doesn’t send them the way of the IMDB forums.

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because each independent section would try to make more money and end up breaking things and adding new shit users don’t want but marketing execs think are good.

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Then find a different workshop/forum/launcher to pair with the Steam store

        In no world is it worse than what we have now

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          He literally just said how it’d be worse. Although that’s probably not how it would get worse, splitting up the services of steam would make them inherently worse.

        • d00ery@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Name an example of a better workshop, I’ve used nexus mods and it’s a complicated mess that requires a subscription to get normal download speeds for content created for free by other people

          • ILikeBoobies
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            If steam is a client not a store then whichever steam allows to be built into their client