A war would be disastrous for both countries. Especially the US.

As President Donald Trump relentlessly threatens to annex Canada, some Canadians are worried that an American invasion could one day become a reality.

How would that scenario play out? Looking at the sheer size of the American military, many people might believe that Trump would enjoy an easy victory.

That analysis is wrong. If Trump ever decides to use military force to annex Canada, the result would not be determined by a conventional military confrontation between the Canadian and American armies. Rather, a military invasion of Canada would trigger a decades-long violent resistance, which would ultimately destroy the United States.

But in this nightmare scenario, could Canadians successfully resist an American invasion? Absolutely. I know this because I have studied insurgencies around the world for more than two decades, and I have spent time with ordinary people who have fought against powerful invading armies.

  • asg101
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Resistance is not futile, the USA has not prevailed (single-handedly) against resistance movements in any country of our size in their history. IEDs are cheap, effective, and relatively easy to make. Canada has farms with fuel oil and fertilizer, and lots of firearms.

    • Dearche
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s even worse. The US hasn’t won against an insurgency ever in its entire history. And really, it hasn’t won a single conventional war since WWII either to be honest.

      While one side would be forced to fight for its right to exist, the other would be forced to weigh the costs of doing an occupation for decades. Not to mention the hit to moral and public support, which in turn translates to support from your own military.

      Frankly speaking, I think the US’s own military would refuse to move if ordered, and Trump’ll have to replace most of the leadership to make them comply. And even then, there’s the thought that most of the soldiers themselves wouldn’t want to raise arms against their longest standing ally.

    • BCsven
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I have always been a peaceful and patient person, but there is no way I’m letting a fascist foreign government take over. I would gladly even suicide bomb a foreign invader if it thrwarted their advance and protected my adult kids , and fellow country members, future.

        • Rob Bos
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          Who’s radicalizing? There’s no US invaders on Canadian soil, what are we radicalizing against?

          A fascist takeover of Canada would inevitably result in a guerilla war. This is just a fact.

        • BCsven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          There’s no religious agenda here, just defending my own country, the same as a military enlisted would do. How do you think we are here today and not living a Hitler regime; people gave their lives for their country. Is Remembrance Day a poppy celebration of radicalism?

          • lobut
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I dunno, I look and sound just like an American. I know I’ll die in a real takeover but it doesn’t mean I won’t do some homemade devices and grab an arm to defend my country.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Many of Canada’s firearms are outdated in a military sense and the government has been continuing to ban more guns. Many fire arms currently owned by canadians would have already been considered obsolete by the cold war, especially if we are comparing our stockpile to America’s.

      • Rob Bos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You’re just as dead if you’re shot by a Ross rifle or Lee-Enfield as by a whizbang gizmo-addled wank-rifle with 10 attachments and a CDROM drive.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sure, but a magazine of 5 in a semi automatic is still a lot less shots than a magazine of 30 in a fully auto rifle. Modern military body armor has come a long way and being a neighbour, america has many naval and air bases already built and fully loaded within striking distance. A surprise strike could significantly cripple canadian military resources.

          • Rob Bos
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Yeah, I don’t think anyone is arguing that the Canadian military wouldn’t get roflstomped in hours. It’s more about the insurgency afterwards, I’d say.

            Not all the American occupiers can be armed and wearing body armour 100% of the time. They have to sleep and piss occasionally.

            • asg101
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Asymmetric war is just so asymmetrical.