What if we handle road safety as general safety?

The hierarchy hazard controls is a de facto standard for determining which measures to take in the presence of risks. The principles can be (and I would argue that they should be) applied to road safety.

From the most effective to the least effective measure, we have:

  • Elimination: Avoid road trips. Of course it is rarely possible.

  • Substitution: Replace dangerous vehicles with non-hazardous vehicles. That is, cars should be limited

  • Engineering controls: people are isolated from risks: cycle paths, sidewalks everywhere, speed bumps, raised crossings, narrowing of the roads

  • Administrative controls: speed limits, 30 km/h cities, speed cameras, training courses.

And last and most definitely least:

  • personal protective equipment: they are the least effective, to be used only if there is no possibility of applying other measures: helmets.

Those who push for certain measures do not understand anything about safety, and thus would start from the bottom of the hierarchy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_hazard_controls

crossposted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113978193983638459

  • Showroom7561English
    8·
    11 hours ago

    Hardly any biker in the Netherlands wears a helmet

    Yes, but:

    1. Head injuries are extremely common in the Netherlands.
    2. Since a large number of bike accidents do NOT involve cars, riders should still wear a helmet to keep their brain safe.

    With the increase in e-bike use, especially among the older population, injuries in the Netherlands have gone up dramatically, so there’s only so much that infrastructure can do.

    We do still need safe cycling infrastructure to separate us from cars as much as possible, but it’s not the panacea that many of us believe it to be.