• humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Absolutely absurdity that has to stop. Greenland is far away from Russia. Fine, some possible ICBM missile trajectories go over Greenland, but NATO is not going to stop US from putting missile shield or offensive nukes in Greenland, as long as it stays under NATO oversight. The Putin Derangement Syndrome that extends to explaining all Trump actions as gifts to Russia needs to stop being said out loud. Pure CIA disinformation to somehow brainwash Europe into accepting this.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s about Naval access to the Atlantic. The Russian Navy has to go between Greenland and Norway. With NATO controlling both sides, they don’t have a route to the Atlantic through friendly waters.

      • humanspiral
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are international waters between Iceland and UK. When US is part of NATO, with as a matter of fact, dictatorial control over NATO, ownership of Greenland doesn’t matter. It is only a severance of US/NATO alliance that makes Greenland matter.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And Trump has also indicated we’re leaving NATO.

          So having Greenland as part of NATO independent of the US important. If Trump were to take Greenland, he could allow Russian Naval activity in Greenland’s territorial waters.

          • humanspiral
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Need to stop with any fantasies that US needs Greenland in order to gift Russia anything whatsoever. Russia has access to both oceans and does not need to go anywhere near Greenland to even ship to US or Canada, much less Europe. It does not care about any resources in Greenland because the closest consumer is eastern Canada and US.

            Yes Trump wants to leave NATO. If Greenland stays part of Denmark/NATO then that can threaten US.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              In the event of a military blockade by NATO after America leaves NATO, Russia’s only route to the Atlantic would involve the Panama Canal or going around Africa or South America.

              And Trump is also totally coincidentally trying to take the Panama Canal too.

              • humanspiral
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                If EU wants to blockade trade between Russia and eastern Americas, it needs to blockade vast international waters between Iceland and UK, in addition to Baltic sea. Blocking such trade will be viewed as act of war by Russia and Americas, and Russia navy alone is enough to break through/sink EU blockade, or nuke the degenerates.

                There is extreme likelihood of EU understanding Russia makes a better friend than US in long term, and failure of this understanding is certain electoral failure. That center-moderate support for nazis in Ukraine is not the obvious moral high ground over home nazis, that happen to be nato skeptics, everyone here seems to think it is. The Ukrainian nazi diminishment of Russia is only a EU favour to US.

                Russia has a Pacific coast that means it never needs to use Panama Canal.

                • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  A blockage of military ships and not civilian ships is not out of the question.

                  And having pacific ports and no access to the North Atlantic would mean using the Panama Canal or going around Africa or South America to reach the Atlantic.

                  • humanspiral
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    They would only need access to North Atlantic if shipping to North America. This would be because they are welcome to ship there, and they would join in seeing it as unwelcome any blockade efforts. There is an international waters path to get there. Greenland and Panama have zero impact on Russia.