From https://reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1hokr0c/mozilla_chair_pay_vs_firefox_market_share_2023/m4aca4j/:

Total 2022 pay: $6,903,089
Total 2023 pay: $6,260,072 - a $643,017 decrease
Base chair pay: $600,000
2023 chair bonuses and other incentives: $5,622,600

Sources:

For comparison, here are other executive salaries ($0 bonuses for each)

Executive name Title Total Pay (2023)
MARK SURMAN PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 715,143
J. BOB ALOTTA SVP, GLOBAL PROGRAMS 508,138
ANGELA PLOHMAN COO, SECRETARY & TREASURER 452,234
ASHLEY BOYD SVP, GLOBAL ADVOCACY 427,701
ZHILUN PANG DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 273,069
DAVID WALKER SENIOR COUNSEL 268,565
LAINIE DECOURSY DIRECTOR, ORG EFFECTIVENESS 267,028
JUAN BARANI SENIOR DIRECTOR, GIFT PLANNING 262,879
STEPHANIE WRIGHT SR PROGRAM MANAGER, MOZFEST 236,785
  • tempest
    314·
    7 days ago

    The CEOs salary has almost zero affect on Firefox’s market share.

    That decline can be explained relatively simply by two things.

    One, people are increasing using mobile devices and very very rarely do they install another browser so they are using Chrome on Android and Safari on Apple devices.

    Two, Google was/is using Google dot com to promote chrome. That is not something Mozilla could ever replicate.

    Then there is the other bit where Mozilla tries to diversify their revenue sources and the faithful skewer them for it and tell them “just work on Firefox” when it is clear the market is unwilling to pay for a browser at all.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.org
      11·
      7 days ago

      Still, increasing payment while market share is falling seems to be the wrong incentive, doesn’t it?

      • tempest
        11·
        7 days ago

        If you look at it from an incentive view point you have to pay people more to Capitan a sinking ship.

        Also worth noting is that market share may or may not be relevant. Android has a higher market share world wide compared to Apple, however Apple users generate more revenue.

        All this to say that the op graph is at best an incomplete picture of things designed to rile up people who lack critical thinking.

      • Kushan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        36·
        7 days ago

        The point is that Firefox market share isn’t indicative of anything useful.

        A better comparison would be something like revenue - if Mozilla makes more money, the CEO can earn more.

        Mozilla does a lot more than just Firefox and I’m fact increasing revenue from other sources should have been a priority anyway