He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

  • corsicanguppy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    a forbidden topic for discussion.

    I’m not getting that from the responses. What I’ve seen is

    • being vague is not effective
    • bad opinions aren’t the same as objective misinformation
    • the username checks out
    • it’s pointless to platform these people

    These all seem to reiterate the idea that “this is not a good post” and not “this subject is taboo”.

    But, if you’re messing this up, does that jeopardize your own efforts?