• snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well, we were responding to the words that were there and not the unsaid context. Even with your edit you are missing something making it clear why the worst part is that they are hiring doctors to deny the claim.

      I included the parts you seem to be in agreement with and included the ‘better than the doctor who saw the patient’ both to make it clear it was sarcasm and why having doctors deny claims is not in the best interest of the patients.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s all good!

          Took me a long time to figure out how much detail should be included and sometimes I still screw up and ride the down vote train into oblivion. The other thing I learned is that clarifying rarely helps, most people see that as making excuses because people in general are terrible judges of other people’s intent.