• acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    That’s ignorant of modern scholarship. Here are some serious historians you might want to look into:

    • Peter Heather
    • Anthony Kaldellis
    • Averil Cameron
    • Timothy Gregory
    • John Haldon

    There are others, of course.

    And no. By the time the Western half collapsed, the East had not drifted apart. That started happening 2-3 centuries later, definitely after Justinian. And it was not even completed as a process until after the 4th crusade at least.

    • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Honestly you are right as someone who started his love for history with the Romans, I didn’t know this was a debate, so I did some research and to me personally the end of the Roman empire was 476ad with the last western Roman empire abdicating. Or perhaps the fall of Constantinople

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Roma Invicta, frater!

        It’s a fascinating topic! Keep learning!