What do you think, ChatGPT? If it can create almost perfect summaries with a prompt; why wouldn’t it work in reverse? AI built into Windows could flag potentially subversives thoughts typed into Notepad or Word, as well as flag “problematic” clicks and compare it to previously profiled behavior. AI built into your GPU could build an behavioral profile based on your interactions with your hentai Sonic the Hedgehog game.

  • usualsuspect191
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hasn’t this been proven to be false? People have monitored the network traffic and phones don’t listen like this; it’s just not practical.

    Instead, they keep track of your browsing, location, contacts, etc and build a profile well enough they don’t need to listen to you.

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’ll vary by the software you have, and the phone you have. Many companies have been caught capturing microphone recordings such as Google, Meta and Amazon over the years to name a few.

      It also depends on the appliances you own, and how you have them configured. TVs, Alexa, hell we even have refrigerators that have live mics on them now.

      I have worked for tech my whole life, this is table stakes for these organizations, ethics be damned.

      • usualsuspect191
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        My understanding is the mics aren’t “live” until the activation phrase is said, then they record and send that data for processing. If someone has proven otherwise I’d love to see their methods.

        The scary thing isn’t that they’re listening, it’s that they collect so much other data that they don’t have to.

          • usualsuspect191
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m sure you’ll find some good explanations online, but there’s an “activation” circuit on the device “listening” that then engages the rest of the system when it’s triggered. So there’s no recording or sending of data until the activation phrase has been said, and the activation phrase detection is done locally on the device.

            • vala@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              This makes sense for devices like Google home where there is only one activation phrase but I don’t understand how an IC could exist that can respond to custom activation phrases.

              Also are you saying that cellphones have this circuit too? I’m pretty darn sure that’s all software based.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          the “it doesnt record you until the software decides so” argument is such a bullshit. does not mke any difference. it listens when it wants, and you cant even verify it

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’d be very easy to take some LLM text about some product, run it through a text to speech converter then quietly expose the phone to it (like put a earbud up to the mic). This way you could easily create a blind or a double blind test, you don’t know what product that this set up has been rambling about into the phone for the past twelve hours and you have to pick it out from the ads you’re served.

    • vala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t need to transmit the recording. Maybe not even a transcript. Just the keywords.