• Jerkface (any/all)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Sometimes they must necessarily be excluded. You just referred to trans people without referring to bi people. Were you “excluding” bi people? Well, in the sense of the word that you just (perhaps unintentionally) used, yes, you just excluded them. And it was okay. Because you weren’t talking about bi people. So it was okay to say “trans” instead of “2SLGBTQ+”. Because you were speaking specifically about trans people and that is OKAY. So what would you have me say when I am specifically talking about lesbian, gay, and bisexual people but not trans people??!!

    You’re so hung up on dogma and culture warring that you’re not using your brain.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        You didn’t say “lgbtq+”. You wrote:

        trans people

        You said “trans”. Stop excluding bi people. Don’t say “trans” say “2slgbtq+”.

        ^^^ that’s you

        I have to think you are arguing in bad faith at this point.

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          this is literally my entire post

          they could start by not excluding trans people. you refer to them just like i said; the lgbtq+ community