• GreyEyedGhost
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If an event like this happened, we could easily maintain most of the trappings of civilization with a little effort and cooperation. So yeah, you’re probably right.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Cynicism aside, civilisation as it is today requires extremely specialised knowledge. Losing 95% or more of our population would put an end to our capability to support any kind of advanced infrastructure. It’d be akin to the decline of Rome, from the biggest city in the world to having farmers farming in the former city area and mining the old buildings for building material. Humanity would be back to scavenging and farming as core activities within a generation.

      • GreyEyedGhost
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is kind of like saying, “What if only America existed?” There would certainly be some disruption, but it wouldn’t exactly be the end of civilization. Now, randomly distribute those people across the world, and it gets harder. But. The hypothetical plague didn’t kill 95% of the population, it made them infertile. That gives you decades to prepare and recover if you’re aware of the problem.