• IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s even easier than that with most people I know

    They just describe multiples of individual animals, objects, places or things collectively as just … stuff

    Flock of geese? … stuff

    A stack of books? … stuff

    group of cars? … stuff

    A planet? … stuff

    A solar system? … stuff

    A galaxy? … stuff

    A galactic neighbourhood? … stuff

    The universe? … stuff

      • IninewCrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        lol … I’m Indigenous Canadian and I speak my language Ojibway/Cree

        This made me realize that the modern things we named with our old language sounds like what you describe

        Aircraft -> kah-mee-nah-mee-kook … ‘the thing that flies’

        Helicopter -> kah-kee-noo-kah-wah-nas-kee-pee-nik … ‘the thing that turns fast’

      • IninewCrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah I know … like stuff … I dunno … shrugs shoulders and walks away

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I once knew a person that ended almost every sentence they could with, “and stuff”. I don’t think I’ve ever used the phrase since.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Thus “phenomenology” means αποφαινεσθαι τα φαινομενα – to let that which shows itself be seen from itself in the very way in which it shows itself from itself. And stuff”

        ― Martin Heidegger