Summary

Dawson City in Canada is facing a crisis as the new mayor and councillors won’t take the required oath of allegiance to King Charles.

They refused in support of an Indigenous councillor who opposes the oath due to the Crown’s history with Indigenous people.

Without the oath, their election could be canceled, and they can’t make official decisions.

The council has asked for a different oath, but Yukon law requires the pledge. Authorities are now looking into the situation.

  • Eiri
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Weren’t people a bit more positive about monarchy back when Elizabeth II was alive? I feel like she had a sort of mystique that made her feel more legit for some reason.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Rumour has it that Charles is incredibly angry about the whole thing and Andrew is very much in danger of being cut off completely if he doesn’t keep his head down, so while Charles has paid people off, he has not forgiven or forgotten.

        There’s also that he wasn’t king at the time he made those payments and may have been protecting their mother rather than his brother at the time. Andrew, idiot though he is, was the Queen’s favourite.

        Had the Queen already been dead and Charles been king at the time the news broke, he might well have let Andrew suffer the consequences.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Uh huh, but then he paid hush money. But he is angry! He is furious about “the whole thing”.

          Dude, come on.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 minutes ago

              The rumor and further theorizing that had he been king during the “whole thing” he would’ve punished him somehow, makes you seem sympathetic instead of acknowledging that hush money was paid, he is still part of the “family” and isn’t in jail when he should be.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      She was more relatable. She had corgis. She loved cows. She was an ambulance driver and mechanic during WWII. Nobody likes Charles.

    • ImplyingImplications
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The Queen’s face and name has been on everything for decades. There are Canadians in their 70s who never knew anything different. That’s just the way things were. It was tradition. That’s how I saw it anyways. Anyone who complained about it was just complaining about a symbolic action we’ve all been doing for generations. Nobody is actually swearing their life to the queen–it’s just a tradition. Then she died.

      Now some random old guy’s face and name is going to be on everything. If we’re going to change everything anyways, then why not change it to something different? The argument that was seen as a small complaint before now makes a lot of sense. If we’re changing the words to our oath anyways, then why not change them to words we can all agree on?

    • dubyakay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Everyone loved the powder pink lizard queen.

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, the current edgelords were still in middle school too.

      It’s cool now to blame the son for the rumoured sins of the grandfather, so it’s empowering for people needing virtue to signal.

      • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Rumored? Nah friend, there’s enough evidence to believe the majority of the rumors. And nobody is saying Charles killed the kids or raped the villagers, they’re saying he benefits from a dynasty and wealth built on the backs of those people, and so deserves no respect or allegiance. And that’s outside of the fact that the monarchy means fuck-all to Canada at this point. In Britain, at the seat of their power? Sure, maybe. But across the pond where the culture, people, laws, food, history are different? Fuck the crown and anyone with an ordained ‘right’ to rule.