• Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I mean old, un-Musked Twitter was what people wanted. Mastodon is similar, and I like it but it’s not Twitter (which personally I couldn’t get into even in its heyday).

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Mastodon is similar, and I like it but it’s not Twitter

      And that’s honestly a good thing. We don’t need Twitter clones, because as much as people remember the Twitter of yore fondly, the people in charge made some really terrible decisions for their users, and a lot of people have forgotten that.

      Mastodon is and should always be distinct from the Twitter-likes; if it starts to be a little too similar, then it’s probably lost its way.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The way Mastodon is broken up into little communities such that it’s hard for anything to go viral and you can’t easily search for everything being said about a topic kills a lot of the value of old-twitter. Comes from Mastodon having been created as a twitter alternative with a different philosophy back in the old twitter days, while bluesky is more a reaction to Musk twitter used by people who didn’t have a problem with the old version.