I still don’t believe you. That article doesn’t mention transphobia at all. It makes a point about sexism, and sexism isn’t the same thing as transphobia. Your claim that there’s an article saying cheese is transphobic is false. Also, I agree with the article. I love drinking breast milk, but only if she consents. And cows can’t consent.
No you can’t, you already admitted you’re susceptible to the inoculation effect. That’s a psychological phenomenon in which exposure to a weak version of an argument increases your resistance to credible versions of the same argument. You made up a fake argument that cheese is transphobic, and it prevented you from critically engaging with the argument that CDPR is transphobic. You’re biased as hell.
I don’t believe you. Google doesn’t show that article, and I followed your instructions to the letter. I think you’re making stuff up.
https://www.peta.org/living/food/why-cheese-is-the-most-sexist-thing-you-can-eat/
I still don’t believe you. That article doesn’t mention transphobia at all. It makes a point about sexism, and sexism isn’t the same thing as transphobia. Your claim that there’s an article saying cheese is transphobic is false. Also, I agree with the article. I love drinking breast milk, but only if she consents. And cows can’t consent.
I might have mixed the example up but the point still stands.
There are two reasons that common things might often be accused of immorality:
I believe in 2. Do you?
Wow.
I believe in nither, I can think for myself and can form my own opinions about shit.
No you can’t, you already admitted you’re susceptible to the inoculation effect. That’s a psychological phenomenon in which exposure to a weak version of an argument increases your resistance to credible versions of the same argument. You made up a fake argument that cheese is transphobic, and it prevented you from critically engaging with the argument that CDPR is transphobic. You’re biased as hell.