• Ghostwurm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nope didn’t read. Admittedly, thought it was just the movie wiki and didn’t go that far. I made comment about the movie not the director. In the context of the article and allegations against Coppola, I am not defending gross and entitled behaviors. Another example of how complicated it is to consider or enjoy the art of transgressors.

    • Ptsf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Should probably read things before chiming in. At least, if they’re pivotal to the conversation.

      • Ghostwurm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Not going to digest an entire article for a link with no context, which on its face doesn’t suggest the actions of an individual. Why would I pick out that aspect? Why am I the defender against allegations of bad behavior? That’s ridiculous.

        Edit: when I first responded there was no direct link to the allegations section, it was just the wiki for the movie. A link without context saying “fuck this”. But hey, people apparently know the intentions of strangers from a single hot take, what a skill. Enjoy your echo chamber.

        • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          At first I had no link, but I quickly edited to add the link, however I only ever linked directly to the “allegations of misconduct” section of the wikipedia article. You might be remembering incorrectly?

          EDIT: I don’t know if there is a way to view edit history in Lemmy to clarify, because of course it’s possible I’m remembering incorrectly - but what I do remember is that when I edited to add the link, I linked directly to that section.