• Em Adespoton
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    AKA:

    “Why are you hitting that screw with a hammer?”

    “I refuse to use a screwdriver; it takes too long and I’m morally opposed to patents that you get with screwdriver heads.”

    “You do know that your hammering is going to make a total mess of things, rIght?”

    “I don’t care; it’s the principled stance I’m willing to take to build this house.”

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      27 days ago

      Claims to have a principled opposition to screwdriver head patents: buys screws anyway.

      Sounds like the Democrats to me. All “I’m the anti-genocide candidate!” while shipping cluster bombs to the middle east.

      • Em Adespoton
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’s possible for both to be correct. You can’t fix the US government by voting third party for President, because the system isn’t set up to support that. First you have to deal with the electoral college and FTTP voting, then the laws on the books, which means electing third party representatives who are willing to support changing the laws.

        And on the other hand, the President can at least call out what Congress is doing that’s enabling genocide in the middle east instead of politely asking for both sides to stop killing each other so everyone can talk, while representing the people sending weapons to one side of the conflict, who are taking advantage of their position in government to methodically wipe out an entire people.