• zephyreks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    so… you really do have no argument, huh? You claim that taking state subsidies makes a company state-sponsored.

    I claim that that’s stupid, because it means that Intel and Microsoft would be considered state-sponsored enterprises.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have an argument against my own argument, no.

      Regardless of what you claim I claim, you’ve already taken my side on all of this.

      Thank you for your support!.

      • zephyreks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you really don’t have an argument, huh?

          • zephyreks
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So… You don’t have an argument against my argument that isn’t your argument, because you don’t understand the argument?

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Incorrect, although you are consistent with your method of pretending someone is saying something they aren’t.

              Thank you for your continued support

              • zephyreks
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You literally claim without evidence that I am using your argument, despite my argument to the contrary. Sounds like a troll who lost an argument to me.

                • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Incorrect.

                  I said that just because everyone’s acting poorly doesn’t make acting poorly right.

                  I used the example of rape, no matter how many people rape, rape is not okay.

                  You agree with me in your following post, that an act is " either ok or it isn’t."

                  Since you agreed with me and conceded the argument in my favor, I thanked you.

                  Thank you for your support.

                  • zephyreks
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    the debate has always been about whether the US’s response is commensurate and reasonable… I think you’re just looking for any win you can find because you know you’ve lost.