• SymbolicLink
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wealth gap gets bigger and bigger, workers feel less and less secure in their jobs and lives, and companies try to blame the people who are making them rich.

    Even worse, they inspire infighting between the working and “middle” class. A person making $100K a year is a lot closer to someone making $45K a year than the executives making many millions a year.

    • EhForumUser
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A person making $100K a year is a lot closer to someone making $45K a year than the executives making many millions a year.

      Not really, because someone making $100k per year has $55k each year to invest in capital. And capital compounds. 20 years later that person will be making millions per year too, while the person making $45k is forever stuck there with no opportunity for escape.

      Like you pointed out yourself, it is the wealth gap, not the income gap, that is pertinent.

      • SymbolicLink
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can agree with that overall.

        But in this specific case (the link in OP), the discussion is centred around employee/employer relations. In that context it’s employee compensation that seems more relevant to the discussion.

        Employers have control over how much they pay people, so if they are complaining about “lazy people”, it feels fair to point out lowered compensation and benefits year over year if you factor in inflation.