This photo shows the power conversion side of two versions of the same board. Input is up to 60V DC, board converts to 5V and then down to 3.3V.

The top board works correctly all the time. But the bottom board has strange issues. Everything works perfectly when I connect it to my bench power supply at 53V. The board powers up with no problems. When I connect it to the daisy chain of other boards, it suddenly will no longer power on, despite ~54V being passed through correctly to downstream boards.

This is a real head-scratcher for me, and I’m having trouble making sense of it. I’m not so much looking for The Solution as to what steps I should take to troubleshoot this. There were some issues attaching the image, so in case it doesn’t show up.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/MCx7Q4BDbKTv68EJ8

  • jjagaimo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Look for differences and bad joints

    • C4 looks not connected right, maybe c10 and c14
    • C16 missing
    • Solder joint messy up above C17
    • The two through hole pads by C19/20 arent soldered and the one above it looks to be a bad joint
    • jumpers on the right arent connected in the same spot
    • extra traces by the IC
    • components can die, especially ICs and capacitors from ESD and drops respectively
    • PCBs themselves can sometimes just be faulty from the factory and have damaged traces.

    Another thing is that small ICs like that tend to be fairly difficult to stick down all the pads. Reworking that might be a good option if checking the above doesnt work

    • tufelkinder@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you, I will reflow C4 and add C16, but C10 and C14 look fine from the sides.

      The messy/missing joints near C17, C19, and C20 are optional components for the other side. (Unused surface mount USB port with through-hole mounting pins and an unused jumper.) Right-hand jumpers are all optional and unused from an earlier prototyping stage.

      What do you mean by extra traces by the IC? And you’re absolutely right about the small IC. It’s the MAX17640, and at 2mm x 2mm it’s a piece of work to land correctly.

      • jjagaimo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        traces by the IC

        I was referring to it more as a difference which might be the source of the issue. For example, one via is fairly close to the pad for C16 which could be shorted (probably isn’t, but still a good idea to check). It could be a wiring issue but could also be a board manufacture issue.