• CyborganismOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Snaps are the almost the exact same thing as Flatpaks, except for the fact that they’re stored compressed on your disk, requiring them to be decompressed before execution, which explains the slow startup time.

    The Flatpak version of Firefox has the exact same problems as the Snap when it comes to some extensions. One such example is using the KeePassXC password manager with the browser extension. The extension can’t communicate with the password vault app because of sandboxing in either the Flatpak or Snap.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not really the case as Flatpak is a totally different architecture. Flatpak uses bubblewrap which runs as a local use and doesn’t require the crazy complex thing called snapd. It is much cleaner and way more portable. Also it has more apps as it is way more popular and not tied to a single company.

      That’s only a few reasons why Flatpak is so much better

      • CyborganismOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah yeah, you’re right. But essentially they achieve the same thing.