• SunshineOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    We need free transit to improve service and the loading times.

    This will also help unhoused people and people with substance use disorders find work and get to services they need.

    To help fund this foreign tourists should pay an entry tax depending how long they stay.

    • Victor Villas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      To help fund this foreign tourists should pay an entry tax depending how long they stay.

      Hmm, I mostly agree with the rest of your comment but you lost me there.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Public transit should be nearly free - but I do think there’s one main argument in favor of keeping it from being completely free - safety. Without a token charge, and with a lack of adequate shelters, busses are one of the most reliable shelters from weather and if folks flock to it to stay cool/dry/warm then it’ll make it feel less safe especially for vulnerable folks including single women and the elderly.

      We absolutely need to move beyond this dumbass neoliberal idea that public transit should be self funding, though.

      • BlameThePeacock
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        That nominal charge seems useless to prevent that specific issue, a daily bus pass is $5 and you can literally just get one from someone who no longer needs it for the day. I’ve given mine away. Even just begging will get you bus fare very quickly.

        I’d rather they do something like “everyone off” when they hit the end of their line, which I believe mostly already happens. That means that people can’t setup on a single bus for multiple hours, but still allows homeless to warm up if they need it for a bit.

        Also, I don’t really care if something “feels’” less safe, I care if it is less safe. I haven’t heard that busses are particularly dangerous for anyone other than the bus drivers lately, the cameras are all installed now, and police do respond pretty quickly when something goes wrong.

      • SunshineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would say in that case we should instead provide housing for all our vulnerable members of society with a round the clock healthcare team as they do in Finland. They got down to 4000 unhoused people recently.

        As we could build 4 storey apartments under social housing to end homelessness in BC.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I do support building out social housing - Austria is an excellent example of how to do it well… but these houses don’t exist yet so I have concerns about how public transit would be until they did - lowering the cost and adding more provincial funding today would help immediately.

    • BlameThePeacock
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not sure why tourists should fund this, it’s mostly locals that would benefit, but if that’s what you want just tack a couple bucks onto the hotel fees to make it easy to handle.

      • SunshineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because they need to pay for their public transit use since they haven’t been paying taxes in the province.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tourists bring in a boatload of money. I’m not even sure how you would enact a mechanism like this… A BC toll taker at every port, airport and land crossing? How much are we charging to pay for that, that somehow doesn’t hurt tourism industries but also completely subsidizes our use of public transit?

      I love public transit, think it’s important but this seems more one of those “things I would like but don’t seem particularly feasible.”

      (Also, if you’ve ever been on the N20 or even BLine and watched a mentally unhinged man threatening women, children, non white people or other vulnerable people, well… Not wildly sure I want to drop the barrier to entry to zero. I can be a scary looking dude and have had to use that at least 3 times in the last year as someone experiencing mental issues went off on a quiet brown guy, a woman and some teens respectively.)

      • SunshineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re thinking short term as more people would have access to work and healthcare services the less strain they will have on their mental health from being excluded.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s a pretty bold leap. I’m pretty confident the guy screaming removed**removed on the street has bigger problems than the lack of free transit. (Also, if you’ve ever take a skytrain you’ll notice how payment is rather optional for most folks with issues.)