Inside a bustling unit at St. Michael’s Hospital in downtown Toronto, one of Shirley Bell’s patients was suffering from a cat bite and a fever, but otherwise appeared fine — until an alert from an AI-based early warning system showed he was sicker than he seemed.

While the nursing team usually checked blood work around noon, the technology flagged incoming results several hours beforehand. That warning showed the patient’s white blood cell count was “really, really high,” recalled Bell, the clinical nurse educator for the hospital’s general medicine program.

The cause turned out to be cellulitis, a bacterial skin infection. Without prompt treatment, it can lead to extensive tissue damage, amputations and even death. Bell said the patient was given antibiotics quickly to avoid those worst-case scenarios, in large part thanks to the team’s in-house AI technology, dubbed Chartwatch.

“There’s lots and lots of other scenarios where patients’ conditions are flagged earlier, and the nurse is alerted earlier, and interventions are put in earlier,” she said. “It’s not replacing the nurse at the bedside; it’s actually enhancing your nursing care.”

  • Showroom7561
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I understand the optimisation. The hospitals must be happy, but if I were a nurse (or doctor), this would make me nervous.

    Any good healthcare professional would still want to look over the results, even if an obvious flag wasn’t raised.

    To me, it’s just good practice (as a patient).

    Or maybe they still do, and this system is simply a reducency safety check.