GOP lawmakers and analysts virtually unanimous that Trump was second best to Harris in first presidential debate

Donald Trump’s campaign was in damage control mode on Wednesday amid widespread dismay among supporters over a presidential debate performance that saw Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent, repeatedly goad him into going wildly off-message and missing apparent opportunities to tackle her on policy.

Even with Trump insisting to have won the debate “by a lot”, Republicans were virtually unanimous that Trump had come off second best in a series of exchanges that saw the vice-president deliberately bait him on his weak points while he responded with visible anger.

The Republican nominee – who took the unusual step afterwards of visiting the media spin room, a venue normally frequented only by candidates’ surrogates – was non-committal on Wednesday to the Harris campaign’s proposal for a second debate. Despite widespread opinion to the contrary, Trump suggested she needed it because she had lost. “I’d be less inclined to because we had a great night. We won the debate,” he told Fox & Friends.

    • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Pointing them out is one thing. Complaining about them is another. And no, I wasn’t complaining about them.

      • CileTheSane
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Cool. Now how about you comment on the rest of the post that was very gently laying things out so that it would not be “incomprehensible”?

        • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s for the invite, but no thanks. Don’t even know what comment you’re referring to.

          • CileTheSane
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Of course not, that would require you actually having a coherent point to try to defend.

            I was referring to this comment by the way if you want to take a stab at actually trying to say something worthwhile: https://lemmy.ca/comment/11599323