Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • wise_pancake
    5·
    3 months ago

    I think your take is too far. It’s just beyond reasonable.

    If a teacher were outside the room and heard a loud crash, they’d go investigate. This is doing the same thing.

    It isn’t identifying individuals, it doesn’t record any information about a person, it simply flags that somebody is breaking the rules and is worth taking a look.

    This is about the least invasive technological solution you could get.

    And it’s a heck of a lot better than alternatives like removing the stall doors.