L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago‘Harmful’ content should not be promoted via social media algorithms, peers saywww.nationalworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down17
arrow-up1129arrow-down1external-link‘Harmful’ content should not be promoted via social media algorithms, peers saywww.nationalworld.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareSzymonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYou’re being downvoted for a valid concern. I don’t disagree that we should block harmful content, but you’re putting that power into the hands of whoever writes the definition.
minus-squareCaptain Poofter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·1 year agoIt’s a real problem with no real solution that few people seem to ACTUALLY want to try to solve.
minus-squaresecondaccountlemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThere’s definitely a solution for it. Most people dont wanna hear it though because the solution would practically ruin their belief/economic system. The four way test is a simple and effective tool for anything dealing with ethics or even business if you want to do things the right way. Journalism has 5 guiding principles but a lot of “journalists” threw that away for more clicks and revenue.
You’re being downvoted for a valid concern. I don’t disagree that we should block harmful content, but you’re putting that power into the hands of whoever writes the definition.
It’s a real problem with no real solution that few people seem to ACTUALLY want to try to solve.
There’s definitely a solution for it. Most people dont wanna hear it though because the solution would practically ruin their belief/economic system.
The four way test is a simple and effective tool for anything dealing with ethics or even business if you want to do things the right way.
Journalism has 5 guiding principles but a lot of “journalists” threw that away for more clicks and revenue.