No one making less than $400,000 a year would see their taxes go up under the plan. Instead, Ms. Harris is seeking to significantly raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans and large corporations. Congress has previously rejected many of these tax ideas, even when Democrats controlled both chambers.

  • CaliforniaSober
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh yea! Just have everyone calculate the top marginal tax rate!

    Why don’t the children just format data?

    As long as you keep moving goalposts then why not have the test of us do it as well?

    • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What are you talking about? No calculations are necessary, just an understanding of what top marginal tax rate is and how it’s lowering correlates to Americans getting poorer.

      What’s your deal? Lemmy is so exhausting with all the little wannabe Mean Girls weirdos like you being so snobby.

      • CaliforniaSober
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that you make it a factor…

        You are the one making this a deal maker, then turning around and acting like,it’s weird.

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          What calculations are you even talking about? Your initial comment getting downvoted is a clear demonstration that people understand top marginal tax rate going down is a bad thing, yet you’re insisting that most people are too simple minded to understand this.

          Is this some attempt at making yourself feel smarter than you are, or what? You still have yet to explain why calculating top marginal tax rate is necessary when data clearly showing the top marginal tax rate is before our very eyes.

          You clearly don’t like the visualized data because you initially found it misleading. And now you’re desperately attempting to claim the data was presented in a poor manner when it really wasn’t, especially considering this is the comments section of Lemmy FFS.