my unpopular opinion is that they are a waste of time and effort.

  • Jerkface (any/all)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It makes the public go into massive debt for the benefit of corporations who make bank. It leaves the city with a dozen world-class sports venues that will never ever be used to their capacity again and which the host city will be unable to maintain, but which they paid for with public money.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      What you’re saying is true, there is definitely corruption, useless building and parking and unequal wealth transfer that happens with the Games in its host cities.

      However, my point is that there is a subset of that built infrastructure that does eventually see its capacity realized again, and that’s mass public transit. It’s easy to see the value of that infrastructure in hindsight, but many politicians and residents are skiddish about making the short and long term investments needed to provide transportation services and meet future movement needs of a population. The Olympics provide a guarantee that the infrastructure will be used even for just a few weeks, which help quell fears that the transit spending would be wasted money. Seeing that we still benefit from transit infrastructure built for that short event, should make people see that transit investment is valuable for all of us.