Bitcoin is Stupid and Does Not Deserve an Emoji
thedabbler.patatas.ca

35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called “Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji”.

F that

  • m-p{3}AEnglish
    374·
    4 months ago

    I loved the concept at first, the idea of a decentralized currency all handled by encryption, and transactions permamently stored in a public ledger for all to see.

    Then the cryptobros and the scammers caught wind of it and it’s all downhill from there.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.worldEnglish
      163·
      4 months ago

      If you want the name of a payment techology that isn’t snake oil, isn’t blockchain-based, isn’t a cult, doesn’t claim to be a currency, doesn’t work on proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, but actually does provide certain privacy guarantees for your basic purchasing needs, is cryptographically secure, and can be used with only FOSS, I recommend looking into GNU Taler.

      The only downside is that it’s not really supported anywhere at all yet. But I do hope it becomes a real thing some day.

      • m-p{3}AEnglish
        8·
        4 months ago

        Thanks, I’ll read on it :)

      • unautrenom@jlai.luEnglish
        5·
        4 months ago

        The only downside is that it’s not really supported anywhere at all yet. But I do hope it becomes a real thing some day.

        AFAIK there’s a lot of talk about making GNU Taler the basis for the ‘digital Euro’ which is curently being debated at the EU Parliement.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nlEnglish
        2·
        4 months ago

        Yea, that is interesting! I don’t really understand a lot of it though. Wonder how censorship-resistant it can be, and whether the receiver would be able to cash it out anonymously.

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldEnglish
          6·
          4 months ago

          I’m not an expert on it, but I’ve done a certain amount of study on it.

          I’m pretty sure there are no privacy guarantees for money receivers. Merchants/sellers would still be identifiable by banks and governments and such. So Taler isn’t what anyone selling heroin or doing murder for hire would want to be using as an accepted payment method. (At least not any more so than credit/debit card transactions will help the seller with keeping their doings secret.)

          But Taler can keep the buyers’ identity secret. Unless you’re doing things in ways that reveal information about yourself, your bank and your government wouldn’t know you were buying fursuits even if they knew the merchant was selling fursuits.

          So all that to say that no, the merchant couldn’t cash out anonymously.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nlEnglish
            21·
            4 months ago

            What I don’t understand is whether it is like “Taler is obtained and cashed out only in a bank, but the link between two events is unknown” or if Taler can change hands during said “link”.

            If the former - I really hope it gets implemented as a card replacement, but it would need to coexist with something like Monero (which is what I use now) that is more akin to cash. But I really hope that somehow non-blockchain full-on “digital cash” could one day be invented, so wonder if this could be it :)

            • TootSweet@lemmy.worldEnglish
              3·
              4 months ago

              How I understand it is:

              • You go to your bank (or use a webapp or whatever) who knows who you are and get them to initiate a withdrawl from your bank account to your Taler wallet in the amount of, say $100.
              • The balance in your Taler wallet goes up by $100. The bank also decrements your bank account by $100 and puts that $100 in an escrow holding intending to pay it to whatever recipient(s) can provide cryptographic proof that you gave them Taler.
              • You go to a merchant and pay out of that $100 Taler balance $9 for a cheeseburger and fries.
              • The merchant receives $9 in Taler from you and checks with your bank that that $9 hasn’t already been spent previously before concluding the payment process and giving you your receipt and burger.
              • You now have a burger and fries and your Taler balance is $91.
              • But the merchant doesn’t learn anything about your identity in the process. But they do have proof that your bank has $9 in escrow earmarked for them (the merchant) specifically.
              • And your bank doesn’t know which of their customers to which they’ve ever given Taler is the one buying from the merchant in question. They just know that of the total sum of Taler they’ve issued that hasn’t been collected yet, $9 is earmarked for such-and-such merchant/burger joint.
              • The merchant can settle up any time, but theoretically the bank can charge per-transaction fees. In order to minimize fees, it behooves the merchant to batch up settlements. The merchant can claim actual USD for every dollar that was used at that establishment by customers via Taler over, say, the last week or whatever in one big settlement batched transaction.

              I’m leaving out some details, but that should give you a decent idea of how things work with Taler.

              Now, as for this bit:

              if Taler can change hands during said “link”.

              That, I’m not sure of. It might be that you can transfer Taler from your wallet to someone else’s wallet (that they could then spend) without any identities being revealed, though they wouldn’t be able to get real USD or whatever without working with your bank which would generally insist on confirming their identity. But I’d think in order for the recipient in that situation to know that they actually had real Taler and not Taler that you had already spent and that wouldn’t actually work if they tried to spend it or cash it in, they’d have to make basically an API call to your bank, though unless the bank blocked all traffic from every VPN and traffic anonymizer (like Tor or I2p) in existence, I see no reason why it couldn’t be done in a way that preserved the recipient’s anonymity.

              So yeah. Not sure. But even if that bit isn’t a thing, I still want Taler to take off.

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nlEnglish
                2·
                4 months ago

                Ah, so probably would not work to evade censorship/sanctions. I would REALLY love to use such a thing instead of my card though.

      • index@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        24·
        4 months ago

        isn’t blockchain-based, doesn’t work on proof-of-work or proof-of-stake

        These things weren’t introduced as a gimmick they are used to solve specific problems.

      • deafboy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        14·
        4 months ago

        GNU Taller is pretty fragile, though. One bank issues unbacked tokens and the credibility of the whole system goes down the drain. It’s the current financial system, just rebranded. Also, it promotes taxation which automatically makes it a cult & scam.

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          4 months ago

          One bank issues unbacked tokens

          1. The Taler protocol has bank auditors built-in.
          2. Your hypothetical would just as much apply to existing debit cards.
          3. Unbacked tokens. You mean like Tether? (Let alone Terra.)

          Also, it promotes taxation which automatically makes it a cult & scam?

          The fuck? How does Taler “promote taxation?”

          Fuckin’ Libertarians.

          • deafboy@lemmy.worldEnglish
            12·
            4 months ago

            Unbacked tokens. You mean like Tether?

            Exactly like Tether. USDT was never backed 1:1 by USD. They don’t even try to deny it anymore. They admit it’s backed by “various assets, including BTC”, which smells like a market manipulation.

            How does Taler promote taxation?

            “Customers can stay anonymous, but merchants can not hide their income through payments with GNU Taler. This helps to avoid tax evasion and money laundering.”

      • radamant@lemmy.worldEnglish
        615·
        4 months ago

        Please describe how I can send the money to my mom in Russia (disconnected from SWIFT) with GNU Taler today. I’ll wait.

        • TootSweet@lemmy.worldEnglish
          16·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know how I could possibly have been more explicit about it not yet being ready for any real-world use cases than I was.

          • radamant@lemmy.worldEnglish
            412·
            4 months ago

            It will never be ready. It doesn’t even make sense. To transact with real fiat like the US dollar, you’ll have to go through an official on-ramp and an off-ramp of the respective government. And to do an international transaction you’ll have to use one of the widely accepted systems like SWIFT. GNU Taler doesn’t appear to address anything like that. Anyhow, my comment was made with the premise of this whole thread in mind, i.e. “Bitcoin is stupid” or “snake oil”. Yet there’s no alternatives to what crypto provides. So is it that stupid after all?

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              21·
              4 months ago

              How wasteful!

              Anyhow, today I’m going to resume using a currency backed by oil and nukes, which encourages consumption on purpose. I will then either exploit workers by investing in a for-profit business, or get poorer.

              But someday, in the future, economics will work the way I expect them to. That’s when I’ll switch to something better!

              • iopq@lemmy.worldEnglish
                2·
                4 months ago

                Russia has had oil and nukes and it didn’t stop the ruble from collapsing in the 90s

                Maybe reexamine your assumptions

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zipEnglish
      158·
      4 months ago

      Scammers use the technology because it actually works and does what it says it does. And criminals and scammers and such are generally the first ones to adopt a new technology. Such as bank robbers adopting the automobile in order to get away faster.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.eeEnglish
      61·
      4 months ago

      I liked the idea for awhile as well. But for me, learning about the “proof of work” underpinning is what changed my mind. That - and the fact that cryptocurrency does not actually have any of the strengths that it claims to have. It’s definitely and interesting idea… but in practice it’s all just scams and incentivised waste.

      • deafboy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        4 months ago

        That’s interesting. I’ve initially written it off as a scam. Until I’ve learned about the proof-of-work.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldEnglish
      41·
      4 months ago

      Did they or did a bunch of media get pushed that told us all what these crypto bros were doing like shitting on beaches and taking our jobs.

      Seriously though I’m picking up on a trend that a lot media has a greater influence on opinion then I’ve ever seen before