• hddsx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why do you think it’s okay to wish death on someone?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wish death on Putin and Netanyahu because they’re inhuman monsters. I hope that’s okay with you.

      • hddsx
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, because I subscribe to Kantian ethics. You can’t make an ethical rule and add exceptions.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Explain how wishing someone would die is unethical. Do you think the world works on Tinkerbell rules? Putin and Netanyahu are old men. Old men die. I wish they’d go ahead and die already. Where’s the lack of ethics?

          • hddsx
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s a difference between wishing death upon them and death my natural causes.

            Do you think it’s okay to be going around and telling people “I wish you would die”? If it’s not okay for some people it’s not okay for all people per Kant

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s not okay to tell people who aren’t actively committing atrocities that one wishes they would die. I apply that to all humans equally.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              You didn’t say the method of death mattered.

              And no one here is telling Trump, Putin or Netanyahu that they wish they would die because chances are no one here would be able to get close enough to them to do it. And if they did, they’d be the ones who would die.

              So you can keep bringing up Kant, but you’re being both inconsistent and bringing up something irrelevant.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                It is some magical thinking that they want to participate in. Most of us would agree it’s not okay for the government to punish people for no reason. Therefore it is unethical to punish any criminals, per Kant. Lunacy.

                  • barsquid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    No worries! Just frustrating to read them and wanted to point out how little sense it makes to pretend deliberate choices shouldn’t factor in to how we treat people.

                • hddsx
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  That’s not how it works.

                  I like Kant because it provides for this:

                  All humans should have the right to marry who they want to.

                  Because trans and gay people are people, it’s unethical to deny them the right to marry because it would be an exception to the rule.

                  The rule you would advocate for would be:

                  People should not harm others.

                  That rule would mean that harming people is unethical.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Why do you expect others to subscribe to your particular interpretation of one particular philosopher’s ethical framework?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        …and fascist wanna-be dictator, which is even worse than the rest of it.

      • hddsx
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Okay and? I hate Trump too. Doesn’t mean I’m going to wish death upon him. I want him to face justice for every shitty thing he’s ever done.

        I want Biden and/or Harris to reform the Supreme Court and for Judge Cannon to lose her job based on her inability to be impartial.

        But death? No

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          isn’t treason punishable by death? And he being very treasonous, not just by inciting the january riots but also by blatantly undermining the Supreme Court and Democracy as a whole (no longer need to vote).

          But yeah, lets justice, once it has regained its integrity, prevail.