• jerkface
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children and are owed the exact same unconditional love and protection.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you want to argue for the ethical treatment of animals or that they deserve care and respect, that’s one thing, and I can respect it. But equating that to what humans, especially children, deserve is ridiculous. If it came down to saving the life of a child or an animal, it would be immoral to not choose the human child.

      • jerkface
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        If you create intelligent life, it doesn’t matter who it is or how it came to exist. Your moral responsibilities to that specific creature are identical. I’m sure you can find edge cases where you have to make a decision between a human and a non-human animal, but even if those edge cases all go to the human, it does not excuse all the other cases where there is no human that has to suffer for you to live up to your responsibilities.