• Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I understand. I’m just sick that one side keeps advocating it and using it while the other just takes it and only protests.

    • CTDummy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Acing Trump is the path to guaranteed violence. People advocating against doing so aren’t just doing so from a moral and/or philosophical standpoint. WWI started with a politician being assassinated.

      Edit:ok clowns, downvote the person saying killing a former president is a bad idea. Like several countries aren’t salivating at the idea of the US being embroiled in a civil war. Gee almost like one or more countries even have a vested interest in destabilising the US and have been accused of contributing to it. By all means though don’t let that stop you.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I know this is a hypothetical but Hitler wasn’t some one man force. The nazi party was a very large organisation and without Hitler it could still have come into power in the climate that Hitler catapulted himself to fame on. Killing one man rarely makes such a big difference. The holocaust for example wasn’t even Hitler idea, although he was looking for something like it. My point is don’t assume the future and take things into your own hands because you’re trying to tip the scales before a suspected disaster, I don’t wanna find out who the savvy maverick that can exploit outrage over trumps death to move even more people to support them and without trumps bafooneries and obvious croniesm actually make a much more horrifying impact.

        • m-p{3}A
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Let’s make an hypothetical scenario here.

          You live before Hitler’s rise to power, and have no ability to see in the future. When would it be justified to take a violent action to change the course of history and to save as many hypothetical lives as possible?

          From that perspective, I don’t know if I’d be able to tell and take action without making a terrible mistake and making everything worse, we’re talking about taking a life…

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        There wouldn’t be a world war. What are you even saying??? There’s no other nation involved.

        Killing the man could potentially save countless lives, avoid a potential civil war at the least and maybe even avoid major international conflicts where the US would actually associate with rogue countries and leaders and leave it’s regular allies.

        Europeans are actually working towards a possible scenario where Trump gets elected and stops supporting them in favor of Russia!

        If anything, Trump could be the the potential spark to start world war 3!

        • CTDummy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          There’s no other nation involved. Except for those that would benefit from US being in civil war.

          How people think killing Trump prevents a civil war instead of acting as the justification a lot of conservatives seems to have been waiting for to initiate one, boggles my mind. Like MAGA and all the alt-right/facist groups behind them just poof vanish or wander off dejected into the sunset. Yeah fucking right.

          • Cyborganism
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, of course they’re not going to disappear. But their leader, the man behind which they really, will be gone. I doubt there will be someone else as charismatic or as famous as Trump that will be able to really the people like he did. Plus there would be infighting within the party to find the new republican candidate.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        How on earth does this relate to WW1 at all? WW1 started because a Bosnian-Serb assassinated an Austrian duke, and when asked to investigate Serbia told Austria to fuck off. Serbia was a completely separate country to Austria, and was purposefully trying to stir up shit in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

        This was a U.S. citizen trying to assassinate a former U.S. president. Nobody else in the world is going to give a shit. We actually do this with startling frequency compared to most other countries.