Honestly, I don’t see anything essential about reddit, or any other social media for that matter. Social media is kind of similar to fast food chains in that regard. It’s not great for us and we can do without, but nice that they exist
Honestly, I don’t see anything essential about reddit, or any other social media for that matter. Social media is kind of similar to fast food chains in that regard. It’s not great for us and we can do without, but nice that they exist
Why care though? It is not like reddit is offering an essential service.
if you don’t want to use it, because it has become unusable, then don’t use it. If reddit users want to keep using it, then they can keep using it.
In the end it is only Reddit’s problem if they start losing users.
(Although, I think maybe this thread is worried that Reddit won’t lose as many users as they want)
I do have quite a laundry list of remarks for Lemmy too. The bugginess and lack of features is understandable. But it is quite centralized and I see a future where it will be more centralized the more users will join due to a bit of a fundemental flaw of federation.
Maybe these problems will be fixable. I hope so, because I think it is a really cool concept. But I am not sure if I agree with the execution of it. I would love to contribute to this project if these problems are fixable.
Well, looking at all the comments in this post, not everyone agrees with that. i do think the Apollo dev is a king in how he has handled everything though
You don’t have to care, nor do I care
There are a multitude of reasons for making the API paid or rate limited, I don’t think the CEO went with the right approach. But it was due time at some point
Of course you can complain about reddit. It just makes you look like a tantrum throwing toddler, especially when you complain about the reddit users that do choose to stay. How dare they make different choices than you
Ask the CEO, not me 😂 I’d have approached it differenly
I agree with both yeah. Personally I would have made different choices than the CEO has.
Have a more realistic planning for developers to adapt. Offer different types of api pricing models.
It all could have been handled more strategically, which makes him a poor CEO in my opinion
This thread really makes everyone look like a bunch of toddlers throwing temper tantrums.
The fact is that Reddit is a a company and companies exist to make money. 3rd party apps are hitting their bottom line and they’re losing out on the 12 cent per user per month they are normally getting. Which roughly translates to a couple of million USD per year. Be honest, you would not donate millions of dollars out of the kindness of your heart either.
They have the right to do this, and you have the right to leave reddit. But stop complaining about the people that do keep using reddit and want to keep using reddit.
My personal opinion is that I do think the CEO has made some poor decisions, and the API pricing is on the high side. But there are many good arguments to be made to make the API priced
Edit: these downvotes though, true reddit moment 🥲
That is a tulip, hope this helps
Kind of thinking the same thing, I want to learn rust, but have not gotten an excuse to start using it. Maybe dedicating 8-16 hours per 2 weeks could help me learn rust and do something more complex than writing hello world. I have some additional time in a month or so, so might as well try
I was thinking about learning rust and contribute to open source projects, so it might be a good option. I do have a laundry list of notes about the platform itself though
About 3 days per year I think
I picked my regional one (technically also better for latency)
I don’t make the rules 🤷 Maybe easier to prove? The media just doesn’t like getting sued.
The article does say:
The man was reported to have sexually assaulted one of the women
They can’t say it is sexual assault, until the person has been declared guilty in court. So they put it in quotes to indicate that is has been alleged by someone else
This is something I explained to a client of mine. I do see AI as part of the Future in software development, but it won’t replace programming as it is just the most precise way to tell a computer how you want things to work.
I think / hope AI will help get rid of a lot of boilerplate code. Where you’ll have AI driven programming languages that only require you to write business logic and define architectural requirements and AI can handle all the details of how it connects, where to fetch and send the data and to do it efficiently
the community is nice.
For now
I don’t agree with it. There are many capital cities that are in terrible locations for highspeed rail and are would be a diservice to the rest of the country.
Cities like Amsterdam, Berlin, and Viena are just the worst places to reach for most of their respective countries. Say you live in Munich and you want to travel to Amsterdam, you are still stuck on the slow train if you focus on a Berlin-Amsterdam route.
If high speed rail is supposed to be successful it should be about covering geographical distance fast. Or the car and planes are still going to be the prefered option.