“I heard you liked puzzles, so I put puzzles in your puzzles”

4C hair gang

T’as pas besoin d’endurer ça. Fais lui comprendre que c’est fatiguant de devoir suivre ces discours de manière intellectuelle, puisque le temps que ça te prends d’investiguer une chose, il en crois à 5 autres. Soit terre à terre et explique pourquoi ça nuit à votre amitié. S’il veut pas comprendre, il va falloir avoir de nouveaux amis.

Kinda why i like reinforcement learning. You end up with silly stuff like this.

Happy b-day! 🥳

Mashing keyboards to denote laughter is common nowadays, but it is often used by people in the LGBT on the internet.

Another word for vagina

Sorry for the empty comment,

I don’t want to pry too much, but in jerboa, do you use private navigation by default?

Also, by other apps do you mean other lemmy frontends? Or just other apps on your phone? Maybe an example, especially if it’s open source, would help a lot.

Lastly, do you maybe have a step by step recreation of what happened? Screenshots and videos might give more context. You also mentioned the lemmy redirect service not working and giving you a 500 internal server error. Maybe more details could help out.

But then again, with this much information needed, i think a github issue should be opened. It doesn’t seem as obvious of an issue, even when looking in the code, so get ready to have to document this issue thouroughly. It would help a bunch.

It might be a little different. Try Settings-> Apps & Notifications -> Advanced -> Default apps

Jerboa doesn’t handle PDF URIs directly. It only handles links related to Lemmy. It offloads that responsibility to your browser. It could have something to do with your android settings.

For more context, here is the file that has the functions that handles link opening in the github source code: https://github.com/LemmyNet/jerboa/blob/main/app/src/main/java/com/jerboa/Utils.kt

The functions of interest are openLink and openLinkRaw.

That’s fair. There are other ways to show emphasis, tone and stuff like that, but it requires text styling. Either way, there’s a fine balance to get between readability and writing style, but you can ditch either, depending on what you’re going for. Good luck!

Banger pannel

In all seriousness there is a few spelling mistakes, abreviations, repetitions and just strange bits of text (like the hhhhhhhh part) that just takes you out of the immersion. Idk if it was done intentionaly, but just letting you know

I had, until I tasted alcohol. You’d think something that ruins lives would at last had a taste that justified it.

That’s understandable. Stay safe

Gen Z here. Tastes like shit

Picross S4

People often think there is an intrinsic link between their assigned titles and their character. A mother is always motherly by the etymology of the word, right? People rely on these labels to give themselves, by association with the labels, the positive traits that are attributed to them. No need to prove you’re compationate, because you’re a mother, so it goes without saying. It’s some kind of cognitive shortcut.

So someone who doesn’t have a mother, according to yours, does not get to experience motherly love. And someone that has a mother immediately does. Even if the mother is extremely abusive, there is this belief that under all of that abuse, there was still “motherly love”. After all, your mother will always love you no matter what, because that’s how mothers are. All of these qualities are attached to someone who gave birth to a child without it necessarily being true.

I do remember you posting about your mother before. I’m not sure if your question was retorical, but nevertheless you kinda know the answer already, right? And even then, it doesn’t seem like arguing back is possible. I’m not sure why you’d be asking here either.

Bumping! Good luck with your fundraiser!

edit: no need for suggestion nvm 😅

Funny thing: 1 + 1 = 2 isn’t material, it’s derived of axioms. You don’t know what you’re talking about

My point is that biologists use the binary to simplify explanations of reality. In reality, what we call “sex” is just an observable variable trait. The question of “what is sex” is just philosophical.

Also, you say that despite what she says, that people will interpret this as “there are five sexes”, when the paragraph that DOES reference her doesn’t say so in the slightest.

You’d have to only read the title of her work to get this conclusion. Quite reactionary, but not unnexpected from a guy who did a video in PragerU of all fucking places lol.

For biologically speaking, there are many gradations running from female to male;

This is what she believes . It was so easy to spot even when reading diagonaly. The next sentence is an observation on the subject.

[…] and depending on how one calls the shots, one can argue that along that spectrum lie at least five sexes-and perhaps even more.

Here, she is saying that sex can be defined alongside this spectrum, depending on how you see things. You can split it up as as many subjective categories as you want. That is her point. To suggest otherwise is pretty disingenuous.

Speaking of disingenuous, I’m not saying your argument, as in you’re the only one making it. No fucking shit. I’m talking about your argument in the context of this conversation (honestly, I can barely call it that). You ignore the points I made below and just slap a definition, answering none of them. What do you mean “immaterial”??? It is by definition material. It has direct consequences on the material realities of these people. Who do you think is doing the corrective surgeries? Randoes on the street? No, it is doctors that use this definition to justify what they do.

Your biologist guy left academia a while ago. His PhD is honestly irrelevant, especialy since he’s a grifter. The fact that you cite a person that is clearly against trans people and that has to grift because he left academia makes me wonder if you actually take trans people and their struggles seriously: https://www.transgendermap.com/issues/biology/colin-wright/

Honestly I should’ve ended this convo the more I read about this guy. The fact that you take a transphobic grifter seriously, as your evidence, and don’t cite anyone else should’ve been the end of that conversation. Not just on the definition of sex, but on disregarding another academic’s text based on only the title at worse, or on the fact that he can’t read at best. If you want an example of how that definition is used to harm people, look no further than the person you are citing. I’m honestly done with your bullshit