• Hyggyldy@sffa.communityEnglish
    713·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn’t do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

    • prd@beehaw.org
      93·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.communityEnglish
        46·
        1 year ago

        So you can’t tell me what’s forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he’d face and from where?

        • prd@beehaw.org
          72·
          1 year ago

          Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

        • Pyr_Pressure
          3·
          1 year ago

          “President” is not “King”

          Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

          Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

    • sik0fewl@kbin.social
      41·
      1 year ago

      Not defending it, since I’m not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he’s done it.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.communityEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Cool. You feel better now that you’ve joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?