trash
fedilink
@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
182 Monate

It sounds like these troops are going to run into preparedness and equipment issues, just like the initial invasion force. I’m sorry to see more Russian lives thrown into the meat grinder for this.

@nachtigall@feddit.de
link
fedilink
14
edit-2
2 Monate

Seems like their “military special operation” is not going as expected. That’s pretty much an admission they expect a loss in the war if not stocking up the forces.

@basiliscos@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
82 Monate

The front line is quite large, so there is no enough manpower to streighten it. Recent Ukrainian successful counter-offence demostrated softness of the frontline, so doulbling manpower on the front seems work on mistakes.

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
82 Monate

As the article notes, Russia and their puppets in the separatist regions have moved forward with annexation. Combined with Putin’s speech claiming that Russia would use any means available to defend its territory, that hints he may use nukes if Ukraine is on the verge of retaking the territory that Russia has annexed. Saber rattling maybe, but no one really wants to find out.

olbaidiablo
link
fedilink
32 Monate

I have a strange feeling that the nuclear weapons he thinks he has (and have to be replaced every few year and probably haven’t) are going to be as effective as that brand new highly advanced super tank that he has but hasn’t bothered to deploy at all.

Inkie
link
fedilink
72 Monate

Fucking hell.

They gonna drag us into nukular war.

@vitaminka@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
32 Monate

пиздец

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
02 Monate

Looks like Russia got backing from its partners at the Samarkand meeting to expand the operation in Ukraine into a full scale war.

Or you know the west could just stop the insanity and get Ukraine to negotiate. It’s absolutely amazing seeing the west destroy itself over this.

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
9
edit-2
2 Monate

That goes both ways. Russia could stop invading Ukraine. Russia, not the West, chose to go to war.

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
-22 Monate

I don’t get what this proves. That Russia is so war thirsty that it can be baited with little effort?

@Stoned_Ape@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
12 Monate

This isn’t supposed to prove anything else than the fact that there are people in the US and NATO who are profiting from such a war. Apparently, you agree on that, because you say that Russia can be baited easily.

What kind of effort do you mean with “little effort”? Do you have something particularly in mind when saying that, or do you mean that you have a general feeling that Russia is easily baited by the NATO into a war?

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
02 Monate

If you bother to RTFA, then you’ll see the report actually says that Russia is reluctant to get into a conflict with the west.

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

And the article never suggests that the Russians would escalate to an all out invasion, just to backing separatist forces plus a few Russian troops. It seems to have erred all around.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
32 Monate

Well that’s the danger with gambling on provocations, you can always miscalculate catastrophically as US has done this time. However, that doesn’t change the fact that Russia tried to resolve this problem diplomatically for whole eight years.

And NATO could stop making Ukraine a proxywar basecamp against Russia, and trying to Balkanise Russia. You know right how that works?

@cult@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
12 Monate

This isn’t really accurate though. It’s pretty clear this is a proxy war for the US to weaken Russia. NATO has made major expansions in Europe at least 3 times in the past two decades and each time it’s been denounced by basically the whole world. Putin might lie to his own people but on the foreign stage he’s been completely honest the entire time. I won’t go as far as to say “he had no other choice” but I do think it’s important to highlight the fact that Biden has publicly discussed the plan to “weaken” Russia.

Zelenskyy ran on a platform to make peace with Russia and they were literally in peace talks about to finalize a plan. It was NATO that went in and disrupted that

I’m not trying to defend Putin by any means, but I just think the framing of “it was Russia that chose to go to war” is painting an overly simplistic picture

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
02 Monate

Sure, the point is that Russia will not stop invading Ukraine, and the west can’t make Russia stop. So, now the question is how anyone benefits from the war being dragged on and escalated?

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
4
edit-2
2 Monate

Okay, but blame that on Russia, not on the West or the Ukrainian government. Ukraine is not obligated to cede territory to invaders, and your framing of the West’s support is just blame shifting away from Russia. The choice and the blame lies solely with Russia. They could pull out tomorrow if they wanted to.

Also factor in that Ukraine’s government wants to put this to rest for good. The last thing they want is Russia coming back for another bite at the apple. They’re going to be less than willing to settle for less than victory, especially if they feel like Russia or Russian puppets will violate it.

This sort of moralizing is not constructive. I don’t really see what difference it makes whom you choose to blame for this. The reality of the situation is that the west and Russia can’t agree whose sphere of influence Ukraine will be in. The west overthrew the government in Ukraine in 2014 which led to a civil war in Ukraine. Now Russia is taking advantage of that to overthrow the regime that the west is backing.

The reality of the situation is that the west is not capable of producing weapons and ammunition at the same rate as Russia, especially now that Europe has been cut off from Russian energy. Ukrainian military continues to be steadily degraded in a war of attrition while European economy continues to deteriorate.

Nothing that the west has done in the past six months has worked as a deterrent for Russia, and now the war is escalating to a whole new level. This could eventually lead to NATO boots on the ground, and a potential nuclear war. Do you think it this is something we should be cheering on?

NXL
link
fedilink
52 Monate

weird you keep framing this as solely the west VS russia as if ukraine has zero say in any of this. The truth is a large majority of the population of Ukraine has volunteered to fight against russia to defend their home and country. Russia could stop the invasion today instead of forcing their men to die for Putin’s imperialist and genocidal dreams…

Weird that anybody still doesn’t understand that this is a proxy war between the west and Russia. Ukraine lost its sovereignty back in 2014 when its legitimate government was overthrown in a violent coup. Ukraine has also been in a civil war for the past eight years, but let’s just ignore basic facts of the situation I guess.

NXL
link
fedilink
-12 Monate

The US is and the EU is helping fund Ukraine yes but you acting like Ukrainians are deciding to fight this to protect their country and family is ridiculous. It just seems like you’re desperate to paint Russia as doing something great because you somehow believe they are a Communist country so you want to defend Putin’s imperialistic endeavours.

Russia has been under fascist rule for a long time under Putin but you don’t want to accept that because “west bad”

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
12 Monate

What’s ridiculous is your lack of understanding of Ukraine. I highly recommend watching this lecture from 2015 to get a bit of background on the subject. Let’s take a look at a few slides from that presentation. First, here’s the demographic breakdown of Ukraine:

here’s how the election in 2004 went:

this is the 2010 election:

As you can clearly see from the voting patterns in both elections, the country is divided exactly across the current line of conflict. Furthermore, a survey conducted in 2015 further shows that there is a sharp division between people of eastern and western Ukraine on which economic bloc they would rather belong to:

You seem to think that Ukraine is some homogeneous blob as opposed to a large country with a complex ethnic situation. I’m also not sure where you got the notion that I think Russia is doing something great. It also hasn’t been a communist country for over 30 years now. That’s just pure nonsense. What I think is that Russia sees NATO expansion to its border is a threat, and it’s now reacting to this threat. Countless experts in the west warned that this would happen, and now it has happened.

Here’s what Chomsky has to say on the issue recently:

https://truthout.org/articles/us-approach-to-ukraine-and-russia-has-left-the-domain-of-rational-discourse/

https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/

50 prominent foreign policy experts (former senators, military officers, diplomats, etc.) sent an open letter to Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion back in 1997:

George Kennan, arguably America's greatest ever foreign policy strategist, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy warned that NATO expansion was a "tragic mistake" that ought to ultimately provoke a "bad reaction from Russia" back in 1998.

Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"

Even Gorbachev warned about this. All these experts were marginalized, silenced, and ignored. Yet, now people are trying to rewrite history and pretend that Russia attacked Ukraine out of the blue and completely unprovoked.

You have no understanding of the actual situation in Ukraine, and you don’t want to accept the complex reality here because “Putin bad”.

NXL
link
fedilink
32 Monate

Good reply.

I still think its wrong to continue to look at this as the west vs russia since that ignores the fact that Ukrainians are defending themselves from an invasion that started because Russia wants to absorb countries while putting 100% of the blame on “NATO expansion”.

Look at Belarus and how they’re essentially under Putin’s rule now. Look at how Armenia is being invaded and Putin isn’t defending them even though it was agreed Russia would help them. Putin isn’t doing any of this to protect anyone.

@sicaniv@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
32 Monate

I still think its wrong to continue to look at this as the west vs russia

West has now turned itself into a conflict based economy. They cause conflicts around the globe to gain on trade front against their competitors. They overthrow governments and install puppet regimes to overtake the market and resources of countries. Its not a first for USA. And it wont be last as well.

Ukrainians are defending themselves from an invasion that started because Russia wants to absorb countries while putting 100% of the blame on “NATO expansion”.

It was west who lured Ukraine into joining NATO without any viable benefits to its countrymen except satisfying egos of its RW extremist factions currently ruling the country after 2014 coupe staged by west.

And before looking into Belarus, Armenia and all go look into Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Taliban, countries in south America and so never ending list of countries around the globe.

NXL
link
fedilink
22 Monate

Yes the US has been overthrowing democracies and installing fascists into power for decades https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor

That doesn’t deny the fact that Putin invaded Ukraine and he shouldn’t have. Ukraine wouldn’t care about joining nato if they weren’t consistently under threat of Putin.

What does your last paragraph have to do with Russia not helping Armenia or taking control of Belarus? Is that just a whataboutism paragraph?

@sicaniv@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
-12 Monate

Yes the US has been overthrowing democracies and installing fascists into power for decades

Then you should also be acknowledging that they did the same with Ukraine too in 2014.

That doesn’t deny the fact that Putin invaded Ukraine and he shouldn’t have

He definitely won’t have if not provoked by Ukrainian fascist puppet regime by agreeing to join NATO and having a NATO base on Russian border endangering Russian sovereignty.

Ukraine wouldn’t care about joining NATO if they weren’t consistently under threat of Putin.

They didn’t agree to join till there was a legitimately elected Democratic govt pre 2014 and untill there was a regime change by west specifically for this purpose.

What does your last paragraph have to do with Russia not helping Armenia or taking control of Belarus? Is that just a whataboutism paragraph?

I wanted you to acknowledge how such conflicts benefit the west and how Ukraine is gonna pay for bringing, an unnecessarily provocative war with a neighboring country like Russia, to their land. West is really desperate to cause conflicts and go on a proxy war with Russia and China using using their neighboring countries.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
02 Monate

The reality is that Ukraine has been in a civil war since the government there was overthrown by the west in 2014. Ukraine is not a homogeneous entity where all the people are united in one purpose. In fact, most of the fighting that’s been happening up to now was carried out by LPR and DPR militias with logistics, air, and artillery support by Russia.

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that Russia used exact same model that NATO used in Yugoslavia to justify the war. Russia recognized independent status of LPR and DPR the same way NATO recognized independence of Croatia and Bosnia. Then they were invited by these newly recognized states to assist in the war. It’s the same playbook, and NATO set the precedent here.

Speaking of Armenia, I recommend reading this RAND paper that suggests using a conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan to extend Russia.

NXL
link
fedilink
32 Monate

Interesting read thanks for sharing

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

Civil war was happening for the past eight years while you were evidently sleeping. You can’t even argue that you’re uninformed about this conflict, because I’ve repeatedly linked for you what western experts have been saying about this for decades. You are just a straight up liar.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

Western experts also say it’s a mistake or a lie to call the past eight years civil war. Pure disinformation. Who is saying otherwise?

I linked world renowned experts like Mearsheimer and Chomsky who call this a civil war. Which experts claim otherwise exactly?

You also continue to claim Ukraine is a victim of a violent coup.

No, that’s not me claiming it, it’s people like Mearsheimer saying this.

Ukrainians wanted closer ties with EU, not Russia, but their government failed them

Now here’s an actual lie.

So, what would you say Russia is trying to do now? Invading regions, removing citizens, starting false elections and voting…

Russia is just following the NATO template used in Yugoslavia here. It’s a precedent your favorite terrorist organization set.

And they even said Ukraine shouldn’t exist and the goverment must be replaced. Smells like a violent coup, but that seems to be ok for you?

Russia has been perfectly fine with Ukraine doing its own thing until the 2014 coup, now that it’s been turned into a NATO puppet state they have a problem with it. Wonder why…

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

Well, this is one big lie. Russia certainly was not fine with Ukraine doing its own thing. From Wikipedia:

Euromaidan are western sponsored color revolution my dude. This is precisely the event I’m referencing here. Hilarious how you expose yourself here trying to claim that I’m lying.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

The coup doesn’t happen overnight you understand that right? Coups take time to build, to install NGOs, groom extremists, take over politics, and so on. If you don’t even understand this, what else is there to tell you.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

If that’s the definition of a coup, then US did a coup on the whole of EU a long, long time ago. All EU politicians answer to US masters and do their bidding over the interests of their own people.

And, no only an utter simpleton would frame things in terms of two sides where one is bad and the other is good. This is a childish perspective that anybody past the age of 8 grows out of. Real world is complex and messy with all countries having their own interests.

Meanwhile, Euromaidan was a coup by every definition of a coup. It wasn’t a secret it’s a well documented thing that again, plenty of experts I’ve linked repeatedly discuss at length. The fact that you continue trying to pretend it wasn’t a coup shows how desperate you are to ignore reality and live in a black and white world that your simple mind can comprehend.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

All this from a guy who recognizes that the crimes NATO is responsible for eclipse anything Russia has done. Another basic fact you refuse to accept.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

Yeah, we’re done here because Russia hasn’t massacred over 6 million people in a war on terror last I checked. I’ll gladly accept your ignorance and lack of skill to detect propaganda. 😂

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
9 Tage

removed by mod

whatever helps you sleep at night I suppose

Belarus had a coup attempt funded and organized by USA, Poland and Lithuania just a year ago. Again, it’s not Russia who gave them no choice, Lukashenko tried to sit on the fence for quarter of century, but finally they forced him to decide. And sure as hell he did not declared for people who want him dead and his country looted.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
-1
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
12 Monate

Thought you were gonna stop spewing nonsense at me?

It is a civil war, and you are the one spreading misinformation here. This is a well documented fact that has volumes of references. I love how you take issue with Russia being part of the conflict while conveniently ignoring the fact that the west is also part of the same conflict.

“Overthrown in a violet coup” is also a broken record.

Because that’s a documented fact that is acknowledged by plenty western experts. The color revolution was sponsored by the west and it constitutes a coup. Don’t know what those quotes are doing there.

It’s strange that these same broken records must be spammed to all threads. Shouting bullshit louder doesn’t make it a fact.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

You could lead by example.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

this is a kindergarten level of argument

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

Says the guy who consistently ignores basic facts and tried to argue that NATO is the lesser evil with a straight face. A guy who failed to pass kindergarten is the one who still doesn’t realize he’s gonna be freezing this winter.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

I don’t care on iota what a lying ideologue thinks about my face to be honest.

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
2 Monate

This sort of moralizing is not constructive. I don’t really see what difference it makes whom you choose to blame for this.

My point more was that you seem to be treating Russia as some automaton that was inevitably driven to invade by NATO rather than a country with leaders that made the decision to invade their neighbor. I’ve only seen you make moral judgements towards NATO, not Russia. This at a time when Russia is making a move to take a very large portion of Ukraine’s pre-2014 territory by force.

I will even say this. Invading countries in response to NATO expansion creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Russia invades, other countries feel threatened, those join NATO, rinse and repeat. We saw the Finns flip a long standing neutrality policy virtually overnight. That’s Russia’s fault, not some NATO expansionism. They made Finland afraid, and Finland responded accordingly to protect itself. If Ukraine had done so earlier, it would never have been invaded.

The reality of the situation is that the west is not capable of producing weapons and ammunition at the same rate as Russia, especially now that Europe has been cut off from Russian energy.

Don’t underestimate the West’s manufacturing abilities. In WW2, it may have been Soviet lives that defeated Germany in the eastern front, but it was US weaponry even before the US entered the war via the Lend-Lease Act. Yes, I’ve seen that study about current stockpiles. The US is more than capable of shifting manufacturing capability to weapons. Russia also lacks some critical supplies, like encrypted radios. Its troops are using simple unencrypted Baofengs, which are getting them killed.

Russia will also have problems with these new soldiers. They’re generally untrained, and the officers needed to train them are mostly in the field fighting the war itself. Many of them will be very much unwilling participants. Ukraine on the other hand has its soldiers trained by NATO trainers. NATO trainers can’t be involved in the actual fighting for fear of escalation, but training carries little such risk.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
32 Monate

My point more was that you seem to be treating Russia as some automaton that was inevitably driven to invade by NATO rather than a country with leaders that made the decision to invade their neighbor.

No, what I’m saying is that Russia has its own sphere of influence and strategic interests, and this is how Russia reacts when the west starts encroaching into its sphere. Whether you agree with that or not is really besides the point.

I will even say this. Invading countries in response to NATO expansion creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Russia invades, other countries feel threatened, those join NATO, rinse and repeat.

You’re making a faulty assumption here that NATO can survive this war. What’s currently happening is that NATO is being shown to be impotent to stop Russia. The whole point of NATO is to provide security for countries that join it, and if it’s not able to do that then it fails at its primary function.

NATO also depends on all of its members pitching in. With Europe losing access to cheap energy, it’s going to be pretty hard to do things like weapons and ammunition production. European steel mills are already starting to close now. Meanwhile, existing weapons stocks have been depleted in Ukraine.

So, will US be able to carry all of NATO given its own economic problems. Will it even be interested in doing so given that US is dead set on starting a conflict with China in the near future?

We saw the Finns flip a long standing neutrality policy virtually overnight. That’s Russia’s fault, not some NATO expansionism. They made Finland afraid, and Finland responded accordingly to protect itself.

Finland might as well have been part of NATO for all intents and purposes. On the other hand, NATO may soon lose Turkey and access to Black Sea as a result.

If Ukraine had done so earlier, it would never have been invaded.

I’m not sure what you’re basing this on. If Ukraine tried to join NATO earlier then we would’ve seen a war earlier. Russia’s position on this has been clear for a long time now.

Don’t underestimate the West’s manufacturing abilities.

I think you vastly overestimate west’s current manufacturing capability. I highly recommend you read what the experts have to say on the subject

https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/return-industrial-warfare

Yes, I’ve seen that study about current stockpiles. The US is more than capable of shifting manufacturing capability to weapons.

Well here are some hard numbers saying that it can’t. The US Army is looking for companies that can build up to 12k 155 mm artillery shells a month. Russia uses 70k shells a day.

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-wants-to-build-artillery-shells-as-it-supplies-ukraine-2022-9

Russia also lacks some critical supplies, like encrypted radios. Its troops are using simple unencrypted Baofengs, which are getting them killed.

Absolutely zero evidence for this claim.

And again, I’ll remind you that manufacturing in Europe is shutting down as we speak

https://oilprice.com/Metals/Commodities/European-Stainless-Steel-Mills-Are-Closing-Due-To-Energy-Crisis.html

https://www.intellinews.com/energy-crisis-europe-s-industry-shutting-down-255913/

Russia will also have problems with these new soldiers. They’re generally untrained, and the officers needed to train them are mostly in the field fighting the war itself.

That’s false. Russia is calling up trained reservists with prior military experience.

Many of them will be very much unwilling participants.

As opposed to willing Ukrainian conscripts?

Ukraine on the other hand has its soldiers trained by NATO trainers. NATO trainers can’t be involved in the actual fighting for fear of escalation, but training carries little such risk.

NATO trained Ukrainian army for 8 years to a NATO standard, and this army failed to stand up to a small expeditionary force of 150k troops from Russia. Seems odd to believe that the remnants of Ukrainian army will be able to stand up to around 450k Russian troops along with LPR and DRP militias.

@sicaniv@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
2 Monate

NATO was created by west to destabilize and weaken Russia.

Pre 2014, Ukraine did not join NATO and preferred respecting peace and harmony with Russia instead of endangering its sovereignty.

West wanted Ukraine to join NATO at any cost, not just to expand NATO but to create conflict and start a proxy war with Russia hopping to gain on trade front.

They overthrew the Ukrainian govt in 2014, by encouraging far right extremism based on hatred against everything Russian and brainwashing Ukrainian populous by the use of its Social Media plateforms, and installed a puppet regime.

Now when Ukrainian puppet regime was going to join NATO, Russia attacked it and trying to overthrow current puppet govt in Ukraine and let them elect their govt again by holding nation wide polls like they did pre 2014.

Now US got things happening in its favour from Russia Ukraine war :

–> It got a proxy war to weaken Russia.

–> It got other European countries who were neutral before, now joining NATO, fearing invasion from Russia like you say in your comment.

–> It got the low supply European markets (after Russia cut supply to Europe) for overpriced sales of its oil and food.

So, if USA is also involved in this conflict and benefiting most out of it then what else is there to stop you from concluding USA is deliberately lengthening this war and care shit about Ukraine or other countries regardless of their NATO membership.

@leif@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
-32 Monate

stop pointing fingers and join the forces. Put your wallet where your mouth is

Calm down. Take care of yourself.

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

No need to get nasty.

are you ok?

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
6
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

@vitaminka@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
152 Monate

speaking personally, i’d much rather prefer some electricity interruptions over being conscripted

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
12 Monate

A cold, dark house is a temporary state next to a cold, dark coffin.

@vitaminka@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

idk what you mean by that

@cult@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

I think they’re agreeing with you

@pingveno@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
2 Monate

I am, as @cult noted, agreeing with you. A cold house and a blackout is a temporary discomfort, but death is permanent. Besides, I’m sure the front lines are going to be as cold and miserable as any household in Finland come winter.

@vitaminka@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

yeah, that’s true unfortunately :/

The way things are going Europeans could be looking at conscription in the near future as well. The more this conflict escalates the closer we get to WW3, and it’s absolutely insane to see people cheering this on.

@guojing@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

European countries dont have the capacity to arm such a number of soldiers, let alone train them.

@cult@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
12 Monate

The US has been the key to the rapid training of the Ukrainians. As much as the US military is a bit of a paper tiger, it’s still got a ton of resources and preparedness for things like this

@guojing@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
32 Monate

It took them 8 years and most of the troops + equipment are already destroyed after half a year.

@cult@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
12 Monate

Same exact comment holds for Russia. Crimea was 8 years ago and they’ve lost a lot of troops and equipment

@OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
2 Monate

Look bae, varjolintu posted literal traffic cams since that’s the level of first party sources we need for people on these fringe websites to put down their Marxist books and tinfoil hats.

Try to understand that if Russians are pouring into Finland despite major infrastructure problems, the situation in Russia is sub-optimal. But I think you know that, given every comment you’ve made in this thread has danced around that topic.

Nice straw man. I don’t think I argued anywhere that the situation in Russia is in any way optimal. However, anybody with a couple of braincells to bang together realizes that situation in Europe is far worse. Russia is largely self sufficient in food and energy production, and has a working domestic industry. Europe now has none of these things, and it’s not even winter yet. European leadership has provided no solutions for these problems.

@leif@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
02 Monate

so why you’re not in Russia, mr sotnikov?

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
-2
edit-2
2 Monate

Please do elaborate on what you’re trying to say here mr anonymous coward?

edit: also given that I want this war to end, it’s weird that you appear to be telling me to go fight in it. Seems to me that the people who keep advocating for escalations are the ones who should be packing their bags and going to fight on the frontlines.

@guojing@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
32 Monate

You are just as pseudonymous here, does that make you a coward as well?

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
22 Monate

for people who don’t know how to use google I guess I would be

@cult@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
22 Monate

How did you get into Clojure? I’ve been thinking of picking it up

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
22 Monate

I got interested in it a while back when I started playing around with FP style. I started with Haskell and really liked it, but I was already working on the JVM at the time and Clojure felt like the closest thing to it. I convinced my team to give it a shot, and things just kind of went from there. I do find it’s a really nice language all in all. If you’re interested in giving it a shot, here are some resources I compiled that my team used for onboarding.

One recommendation I can make is to set up editor integration with the REPL. This is one key feature in Lisps that isn’t present in mainstream languages. You can start up your application, connect the editor to it, and then evaluate any code you write immediately. This creates a really tight feedback loop between writing the code and seeing the results. This is an example of how it works with the VS Code plugin, but similar setup is available in Emacs, and other editors.

@cult@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
42 Monate

Wow this is really good advice, thanks so much! I’ll definitely make use of those resources. I think the biggest thing for me when picking up a new tech/language is finding the right hobby project to spend too much time on haha

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
link
fedilink
22 Monate

Yeah, I find that as well. Usually I’ll do some scripting to automate something or play around with doing visualizaions. Here’s a little example of doing some stuff with graphics.

Babashka also worth a mention, it’s a lightweight runtime for Clojure that has low memory overhead and fast startup https://babashka.org/

You can do dev against a repl with it as well, you just run bb --nrepl-server and connect the editor to the port it starts on. Might be the fastest way to play with the language. :)

@leif@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
-12 Monate

are you ok?

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
6
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

Yeah, enjoy energy shortages along with the refugees from Russia. I’m sure nothing but great times ahead for Finland here.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
7
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

We certainly will see what happens in a few months, and if the experts that were wrong about everything until now will suddenly end up being right about energy security.

@varjolintu@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
9 Tage

deleted by creator

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

  • 0 users online
  • 13 users / day
  • 36 users / week
  • 82 users / month
  • 270 users / 6 months
  • 15 subscribers
  • 2.24K Posts
  • 6.55K Comments
  • Modlog