The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?
Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.
Many more vaccines were administered in 2021. Dividing by total number of vaccines likely yields almost constant ratios. (This is just a guess as I did not look at the data…)
This is most likely the correct explanation. Compared to COVID, the number of people who take flu vaccination is insignificant.
I have gotten the flu vacc the first time this year, because why not
deleted by creator
The difference here is not a matter of percentages but of orders of magnitude. How much is the increase in number of vaccines administered between 2021 and, say, 2018? A few thousand-fold?
deleted by creator
Please go through the link in the opening post. Age wise data is available, and it doesn’t agree with your hypothesis.
deleted by creator
I am just asking for explanation of the data. If you have to involve covid vaccines specifically, that is your call. I am ok with any good explanation that holds.
deleted by creator
More than half of US population gets flu shots annually.
I am sure you can think of something more relevant.
It doesn’t.
Over 100 million vaccines were being administered in USA annually even before covid.
Yes the novel messenger RNA vaccines cause heart inflamation and sometimes death. This is well established by now.
Most people see covid 19 as a big threat (presidents were not laughed at when they called it a war) so they don’t care about a few people being dying as part of the battle.
From what I can tell, myocarditis is not deadly if treated. Also, COVID-19 can cause myocarditis, so refusing to be vaccinated over that possibility could likely lead you down the same path anyway.
It’s a risk worth taking with the threat of COVID.
People have fallen down the stairs and died while going to the bunker during a bombardment.
Ignoring the data is a risk worth taking?
That’s not what I said. You have one datapoint here. What claims are you making anyways? That the vaccine is very deadly?
I have linked the complete available dataset of one possibly fatal side effect of vaccines administered in USA. If you are treating one year’s data as one datapoint, the same vocabulary must be applied to data about efficacy of vaccines : one year’s data is just one datapoint.
What I am claiming here is that there is adverse data available, and even if we want to dismiss vaccines as a cause, that data needs explaining.
I would be interested in an explanation as well. I just haven’t seen any
Also this:
VAERS is an early warning system that can generate hypotheses that require adjudication of reports; it was never intended to be used as a research dataset, said blogger David Gorski, MD, PhD, of Wayne State University in Detroit.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94530
Conclusion: The data looks like it would be interesting to investigate, but the investigation has long been done. Look at the first article for example.
The journey from denying that the anomaly even exists, to accepting that it does, and claiming that it has been investigated, is no trivial progress. I congratulate you for making it.
Now it would be good to see the details of the relevant investigation describing the causes of anomaly, before jumping into attempts to trivialize it by confounding it with other issues.
there seems to be some myocarditis especially for young men in their 20’s.
Please go through the link given in opening post for age-wise data. The 2021 anamoly is through all ages, not just in 20’s crowd.
