• TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there some reason that we can’t work to have a more equitable society racially and economically? It’s not a zero sum game, we can care about and accomplish more than one thing at a time…

    • TheOlympian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Even if the real villain was capitalism all along (spoiler: it is), we can’t abandon all of these battles along the way in hopes of winning the war in the end. The fight will take generations and we need to win ground on multiple fronts to have any hope of real, honest to goodness, change.

    • dedale@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reducing economical disparities will solve the so-called “racial” inequalities.
      Affordable education, housing and care for all don’t necessitate discrimination, even positive.
      When an university degree costs hundreds of thousands, the problem isn’t the ethnic makeup of the happy few who can afford it, it’s scarcity itself.
      European state manage to fund a higher education for pretty much all of those that care to try it, it is not an impossible dream.

      edit: to clarify, I don’t think ending affirmative action before making any general progress is a good idea or will do any good.
      just to keep eyes on the prize and be aware of diversion tactics.

    • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How would one sustainably protect/save the Jews (and all the other victimized groups) without first dismantling the Nazi regime?

      Sure you can free this camp and that camp without marching on Berlin, but if the machine, the source that propagates it and maintains it remains intact, you’re addressing a symptom of the primary cause and they’ll just build more camps.

      If you resolve one social wedge, they’ll stoke another in it’s place through the government they fully captured decades ago. Why do you think they’re actively unresolving decades settled resolutions through their Federalist Society judges?

      • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m just going to quote the comment that you are replying to, since you don’t seem to have read it.

        Is there some reason that we can’t work to have a more equitable society racially and economically? It’s not a zero sum game, we can care about and accomplish more than one thing at a time…

        I don’t agree that the sole cause of racial inequity is economic. If you only address the economic factors, then you will still be left with an unjust society. Again, what I am saying is that we can do more than one thing at a time.

        To address your analogy, what you’re proposing would be like marching on Berlin and leaving the camps in place, and just assuming that the folks in the will be fine once you overthrow the Nazis without actually doing the work to make sure that is the case. In reality, allied forces liberated the camps in the process of marching toward Berlin. That is what I am trying to say. We need to dismantle all of the machinery of oppression, not just the economic parts.

        Edit: This probably came across as unnecessarily combative. I’m going to take a step back from this thread for a while. Ya’ll stay nice.

        • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For all the camps we’ve freed that get unfreed, abortion, civil rights, on and on, We NEVER seem to get around on marching on Berlin. In fact, Berlin has has been reinforcing its walls and turrets unopposed for over 50 years. They do make so many jobs after all. We hate the camps, but ignore the ones that commission them.

    • OOFshoot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, in my mind forgetting about race problems meant that everyone stopped being racist and shit. The economic inequalities associated with race wouldn’t disappear overnight, but they would eventually go away since social safety nets would obviously benefit the poorest people the most. But basically that flip comment was imagining a world where everyone really was colorblind.

      • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No worries. And yeah, in a world where everyone magically had no conscious or unconscious bias, I suppose that by fixing economic inequality we would eventually address most other inequities associated with race. And that’s nice to think about.

        But I don’t think I have to tell you that we don’t live in that world, so the bias (conscious and unconscious) remains, and the systemic inequities also remain.

        And it’s fine to imagine a better world, but if there are folks arguing that actually, addressing the plight of minorities is a distraction from the more important “class war” and that winning that fight will magically fix everything else, your comment comes across as more of the same.